Telechat Review of draft-ietf-sidr-publication-10
review-ietf-sidr-publication-10-secdir-telechat-wouters-2017-01-12-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-sidr-publication
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 12)
Type Telechat Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2017-01-17
Requested 2016-12-16
Other Reviews Genart Last Call review of -09 by Peter Yee (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -09 by Paul Wouters (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -10 by Ron Bonica (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -10 by Peter Yee (diff)
Review State Completed
Reviewer Paul Wouters
Review review-ietf-sidr-publication-10-secdir-telechat-wouters-2017-01-12
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/cnJwLmE5_rzj-QkiYezYfKu7V-A
Reviewed rev. 10 (document currently at 12)
Review result Ready
Draft last updated 2017-01-12
Review completed: 2017-01-12

Review
review-ietf-sidr-publication-10-secdir-telechat-wouters-2017-01-12

On Mon, 9 Jan 2017, Rob Austein wrote:

> I'm not going to attempt to answer point by point, because that would
> drive us both nuts.  Instead, I'm going to answer a few specific
> points, then let you see if the text changes I made are satisfactory.
>
> Overall, this required a bit more new text than I would have preferred
> at the end of Last Call, but I think you identified some missing
> background information that needed adding, and none of the new text is
> intended to change the protocol itself in any way, so I'm hoping this
> will be acceptable to all parties.

The text and your email clarified a lot. Thanks!

> I have not yet submitted the updated I-D (-10).  Will do so tomorrow
> unless I hear loud screaming, as our AD wants an updated I-D this
> week.  For the moment, you can see the updated version and a diffs at:
>
> https://subvert-ietf.hactrn.net/sidr-publication/draft-ietf-sidr-publication-10.txt
> https://subvert-ietf.hactrn.net/sidr-publication/draft-ietf-sidr-publication-10-from-09.diff.html

I've read the changes. Those along with the clarifications in your email
resolve all my issues. So from a SecDir review point of view, this
document is now Ready.

Thank you,

Paul