Last Call Review of draft-ietf-sipcore-6665-clarification-00
review-ietf-sipcore-6665-clarification-00-opsdir-lc-wicinski-2015-06-30-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-sipcore-6665-clarification |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 00) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
Deadline | 2015-06-23 | |
Requested | 2015-06-08 | |
Authors | Adam Roach | |
I-D last updated | 2015-06-30 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -00
by Tom Taylor
Secdir Last Call review of -00 by Hilarie Orman Opsdir Last Call review of -00 by Tim Wicinski |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Tim Wicinski |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-sipcore-6665-clarification by Ops Directorate Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 00 | |
Result | Has nits | |
Completed | 2015-06-30 |
review-ietf-sipcore-6665-clarification-00-opsdir-lc-wicinski-2015-06-30-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG review. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. Status: Ready with nits This document is Standards Track, and will update RFC6665 with a clarification on when to use Globally Routable User Agent URIs (GRUUs) in SIP Event Notification Framework. nit: The Introduction says "This document is intended to clarify a point of implementor confusion arising from lack of clarity in [RFC2119]", yet in the clarification section it does not explicitly point out the RFC2119 confusion. However, the updated text of RFC6665 is fine, including the detailed clarificaiton portion.