Last Call Review of draft-ietf-storm-ipsec-ips-update-03
review-ietf-storm-ipsec-ips-update-03-genart-lc-dupont-2013-08-15-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-storm-ipsec-ips-update |
|---|---|---|
| Requested rev. | no specific revision (document currently at 04) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2013-08-19 | |
| Requested | 2013-08-08 | |
| Authors | David Black, Paul Koning | |
| Draft last updated | 2013-08-15 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -03 by Francis Dupont
(diff)
Genart Telechat review of -03 by Francis Dupont (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -03 by Taylor Yu (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Francis Dupont |
| State | Completed | |
| Review | review-ietf-storm-ipsec-ips-update-03-genart-lc-dupont-2013-08-15 | |
| Reviewed rev. | 03 (document currently at 04) | |
| Review result | Almost Ready | |
| Review completed: | 2013-08-15 |
Review
review-ietf-storm-ipsec-ips-update-03-genart-lc-dupont-2013-08-15
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-storm-ipsec-ips-update-03.txt Reviewer: Francis Dupont Review Date: 2013-08-14 IETF LC End Date: 2013-08-19 IESG Telechat date: unknown Summary: Almost ready Major issues: None Minor issues: - this is in fact a pure editorial concern but as it can have a big impact on not IETF expert readers I put it here: At the end of 3 page 9: use of IPsec v3 is recommended -> use of IPsec v3 is RECOMMENDED Two notes for the discussion: - a RFC 2119 keyword doesn't need to be capitalized - it is the only place with a preference for IPsec v3 over v2. Nits/editorial comments: - Authors' Addresses page 16 (twice): US -> USA Regards Francis.Dupont at fdupont.fr