Last Call Review of draft-ietf-storm-ipsec-ips-update-03
review-ietf-storm-ipsec-ips-update-03-genart-lc-dupont-2013-08-15-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-storm-ipsec-ips-update |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 04) | |
Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2013-08-19 | |
Requested | 2013-08-08 | |
Authors | David L. Black , Paul Koning | |
I-D last updated | 2015-10-14 (Latest revision 2013-10-21) | |
Completed reviews |
Genart IETF Last Call review of -03
by Francis Dupont
(diff)
Genart Telechat review of -03 by Francis Dupont (diff) Secdir IETF Last Call review of -03 by Taylor Yu (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Francis Dupont |
State | Completed | |
Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-storm-ipsec-ips-update by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 03 (document currently at 04) | |
Result | Almost ready | |
Completed | 2013-08-15 |
review-ietf-storm-ipsec-ips-update-03-genart-lc-dupont-2013-08-15-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-storm-ipsec-ips-update-03.txt Reviewer: Francis Dupont Review Date: 2013-08-14 IETF LC End Date: 2013-08-19 IESG Telechat date: unknown Summary: Almost ready Major issues: None Minor issues: - this is in fact a pure editorial concern but as it can have a big impact on not IETF expert readers I put it here: At the end of 3 page 9: use of IPsec v3 is recommended -> use of IPsec v3 is RECOMMENDED Two notes for the discussion: - a RFC 2119 keyword doesn't need to be capitalized - it is the only place with a preference for IPsec v3 over v2. Nits/editorial comments: - Authors' Addresses page 16 (twice): US -> USA Regards Francis.Dupont at fdupont.fr