Telechat Review of draft-ietf-taps-arch-18
review-ietf-taps-arch-18-intdir-telechat-volz-2023-08-25-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-taps-arch |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 19) | |
| Type | Telechat Review | |
| Team | Internet Area Directorate (intdir) | |
| Deadline | 2023-09-01 | |
| Requested | 2023-08-21 | |
| Requested by | Éric Vyncke | |
| Authors | Tommy Pauly , Brian Trammell , Anna Brunstrom , Gorry Fairhurst , Colin Perkins | |
| I-D last updated | 2023-08-25 | |
| Completed reviews |
Opsdir Telechat review of -18
by Dhruv Dhody
(diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -18 by Bernie Volz (diff) Secdir Early review of -12 by Watson Ladd (diff) Artart Early review of -11 by Robert Sparks (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -17 by Watson Ladd (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -17 by Dhruv Dhody (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Bernie Volz |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Telechat review on draft-ietf-taps-arch by Internet Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/0aBhcszDj4fT06eHFb_n4G7nI7I | |
| Reviewed revision | 18 (document currently at 19) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2023-08-25 |
review-ietf-taps-arch-18-intdir-telechat-volz-2023-08-25-00
I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-taps-arch. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more details on the INT Directorate, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/. Based on my review, if I was on the IESG I would ballot this document as NO OBJECTION. The document is well written and seems complete. I have only a few minor nits: - In section 4.1.4: “If successful, the Rendezvous call returns a Connection object to represent the established peer-to-peer connection.” Doesn’t sound very asynchronous, especially because of “established” which implies it could take some time? - In section 1.4, the last entry (Transport Services System) is missing period at end on sentence.