Skip to main content

Telechat Review of draft-ietf-taps-arch-18

Request Review of draft-ietf-taps-arch
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 19)
Type Telechat Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2023-09-05
Requested 2023-08-16
Authors Tommy Pauly , Brian Trammell , Anna Brunstrom , Gorry Fairhurst , Colin Perkins
I-D last updated 2023-08-26
Completed reviews Opsdir Telechat review of -18 by Dhruv Dhody (diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -18 by Bernie Volz (diff)
Secdir Early review of -12 by Watson Ladd (diff)
Artart Early review of -11 by Robert Sparks (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -17 by Watson Ladd (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -17 by Dhruv Dhody (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Dhruv Dhody
State Completed
Request Telechat review on draft-ietf-taps-arch by Ops Directorate Assigned
Posted at
Reviewed revision 18 (document currently at 19)
Result Ready
Completed 2023-08-26
# OPSDIR review of draft-ietf-taps-arch-18

I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of
the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in the last-call may be
included in AD reviews during the IESG review.  Document editors and WG chairs
should treat these comments just like any other last-call comments.

The document is clear and well-written. The motivation is described well. The
architecture is clean. I did a review of the -17 version. All comments and 
nits identified are handled by the new version. I made a suggestion to think 
about adding an explicit section for Operations and Manageability. But I 
assume the authors did not think it was useful for an API architecture 
document and that's okay. But I would have appreciated a reply anyway.