Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang-25
review-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang-25-genart-lc-sarikaya-2024-05-27-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 29)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2024-05-30
Requested 2024-05-16
Authors Young Lee , Dhruv Dhody , Daniele Ceccarelli , Igor Bryskin , Bin Yeong Yoon
I-D last updated 2024-05-27
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -25 by Behcet Sarikaya (diff)
Yangdoctors Last Call review of -24 by Andy Bierman (diff)
Rtgdir Last Call review of -28 by Susan Hares (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -26 by Shivan Kaul Sahib (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -26 by Bo Wu (diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -22 by Darren Dukes (diff)
Yangdoctors Early review of -10 by Andy Bierman (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Behcet Sarikaya
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/m-9xfumE_DNrrDWgAfheJb-7srY
Reviewed revision 25 (document currently at 29)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2024-05-27
review-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang-25-genart-lc-sarikaya-2024-05-27-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>.

Document: draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang-??
Reviewer: Behcet Sarikaya
Review Date: 2024-05-27
IETF LC End Date: 2024-05-30
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary:This document presents a YANG data model generally applicable to any

mode of Virtual Network operations. The effort that went into the document is appreciated.

The document is well written and understandable.


Major issues:None

Minor issues:None

Nits/editorial comments:
The YANG model has been checked by YANGDOCTORS and the issues found have been cleared by Rev. 25.

I list here the nits I found:

Section 1. MDSC <- MSDC (only one occurrence)

Section 1.2 

this this document. (only one this is OK) 


The document has 3 figures with the last one in Section 2.2

afterwards the figure notation is dropped and illustration notation is used.

Note. This is just a comment no action needed.