Telechat Review of draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-24
review-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-24-intdir-telechat-haberman-2023-07-18-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 27) | |
Type | Telechat Review | |
Team | Internet Area Directorate (intdir) | |
Deadline | 2023-08-04 | |
Requested | 2023-07-15 | |
Requested by | Éric Vyncke | |
Authors | Adrian Farrel | |
I-D last updated | 2023-07-18 | |
Completed reviews |
Secdir Last Call review of -24
by Shawn M Emery
(diff)
Artart Last Call review of -24 by Rich Salz (diff) Genart Last Call review of -24 by Behcet Sarikaya (diff) Tsvart Last Call review of -24 by Bob Briscoe (diff) Intdir Telechat review of -24 by Brian Haberman (diff) Rtgdir Early review of -21 by John Drake (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Brian Haberman |
State | Completed | |
Request | Telechat review on draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis by Internet Area Directorate Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/-14_DeCRVARQIdxhWcQwvHvn1wY | |
Reviewed revision | 24 (document currently at 27) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2023-07-18 |
review-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-24-intdir-telechat-haberman-2023-07-18-00
I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for <draft-foo.txt>. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more details on the INT Directorate, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/>. I reviewed this draft as a diff between it and RFC 3272. I found it well-written and ready for publication. I see no issues with the draft from an INT Area perspective.