Skip to main content

Telechat Review of draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-24
review-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-24-intdir-telechat-haberman-2023-07-18-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 27)
Type Telechat Review
Team Internet Area Directorate (intdir)
Deadline 2023-08-04
Requested 2023-07-15
Requested by Éric Vyncke
Authors Adrian Farrel
I-D last updated 2023-07-18
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -24 by Shawn M Emery (diff)
Artart Last Call review of -24 by Rich Salz (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -24 by Behcet Sarikaya (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -24 by Bob Briscoe (diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -24 by Brian Haberman (diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -21 by John Drake (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Brian Haberman
State Completed
Request Telechat review on draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis by Internet Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/-14_DeCRVARQIdxhWcQwvHvn1wY
Reviewed revision 24 (document currently at 27)
Result Ready
Completed 2023-07-18
review-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-24-intdir-telechat-haberman-2023-07-18-00
I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for <draft-foo.txt>. These comments
were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors. Document
editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they would treat
comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along with any other
Last Call comments that have been received. For more details on the INT
Directorate, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/>.

I reviewed this draft as a diff between it and RFC 3272. I found it
well-written and ready for publication. I see no issues with the draft from an
INT Area perspective.