Telechat Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc6146-bis-10
review-ietf-v6ops-rfc6146-bis-10-dnsdir-telechat-reid-2026-07-06-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc6146-bis
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 10)
Type Telechat Review
Team DNS Directorate (dnsdir)
Deadline 2026-07-07
Requested 2026-07-01
Authors Marcelo Bagnulo , Philip Matthews , Jordi Palet Martinez
I-D last updated 2026-07-02 (Latest revision 2026-07-02)
Completed reviews Dnsdir IETF Last Call review of -07 by Jim Reid (diff)
Tsvart IETF Last Call review of -07 by Joerg Ott (diff)
Intdir IETF Last Call review of -07 by Satoru Matsushima (diff)
Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -07 by Tony Li (diff)
Artart IETF Last Call review of -07 by John R. Levine (diff)
Dnsdir Telechat review of -10 by Jim Reid
Artart Telechat review of -10 by John R. Levine
Assignment Reviewer Jim Reid
State Completed
Request Telechat review on draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc6146-bis by DNS Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsdir/piW-P7M67kVL3XKol07wphw5WUg
Reviewed revision 10
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2026-07-06
review-ietf-v6ops-rfc6146-bis-10-dnsdir-telechat-reid-2026-07-06-00
I remain the DNS directorate reviewer of this I-D. Since the document has no
significant DNS content my comments focus on the readability of the text. In my
view, it is still defective. Some of the points raised in my earlier review
have not been satisfactorily addressed.

The I-D is riddled wth "a/the stateful NAT64". NAT64 what? Implementation?
Specification? Protocol? System? Client? Server? A clarifying noun is needed
each time this phrase is used. The current text is the equivalent of saying
"the HTTP" or "the IPv6". Which is confusing and unhelpful.

The paragraph beginning "Special thanks to Alberto Leiva Popper..." is still
clumsily written and difficult to understand. It needs to be overhauled or
deleted. Removing it or just saying "Special thanks to Alberto Leiva Popper."
would be best.