Last Call Review of draft-ietf-xmpp-websocket-07
review-ietf-xmpp-websocket-07-secdir-lc-nystrom-2014-07-10-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-xmpp-websocket |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 10) | |
| Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2014-07-04 | |
| Requested | 2014-06-26 | |
| Authors | Lance Stout, Jack Moffitt , Eric Cestari | |
| I-D last updated | 2015-10-14 (Latest revision 2014-09-10) | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart IETF Last Call review of -07
by Dan Romascanu
(diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -07 by Dan Romascanu (diff) Secdir IETF Last Call review of -07 by Magnus Nyström (diff) Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -07 by Jürgen Schönwälder (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Magnus Nyström |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-xmpp-websocket by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 07 (document currently at 10) | |
| Result | Has nits | |
| Completed | 2014-07-10 |
review-ietf-xmpp-websocket-07-secdir-lc-nystrom-2014-07-10-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG . These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. This document defines web sockets as a transport protocol for XMPP. The Sec Cons sections looks adequate to me. One editorial question on Section 3.9: Should “when TLS is used, it MUST be enabled the WebSocket layer ” have read “when TLS is used, it MUST be enabled at the WebSocket layer ” ? Thanks, -- Magnus