Last Call Review of draft-rsalz-2028bis-05
review-rsalz-2028bis-05-i18ndir-lc-levine-2022-02-12-00
Request | Review of | draft-rsalz-2028bis |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 07) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Internationalization Directorate (i18ndir) | |
Deadline | 2022-03-07 | |
Requested | 2022-02-09 | |
Requested by | Lars Eggert | |
Authors | Rich Salz | |
I-D last updated | 2022-02-12 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -05
by Vijay K. Gurbani
(diff)
Iotdir Last Call review of -05 by Ted Lemon (diff) Rtgdir Last Call review of -05 by Sasha Vainshtein (diff) Tsvart Last Call review of -05 by David L. Black (diff) I18ndir Last Call review of -05 by John R. Levine (diff) |
|
Comments |
We're trying to maximize the reviews for documents associated with the change in the RFC Editor model. Hence the request to review these pretty short documents, even though they may not need a review from a technical perspective. |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | John R. Levine |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-rsalz-2028bis by Internationalization Directorate Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i18ndir/5oOI1J1AlEsxEmJj76zItW09EeA | |
Reviewed revision | 05 (document currently at 07) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2022-02-12 |
review-rsalz-2028bis-05-i18ndir-lc-levine-2022-02-12-00
This draft says nothing about i18n which is OK. If a different, much longer draft talked about the various other SDOs with which we have to coordinate, then there would be plenty to say, but that's not this draft.