IANA Registration for Enumservices email, fax, mms, ems, and sms
RFC 4355

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
05 (System) Notify list changed from <paf@cisco.com>, <rich.shockey@neustar.biz> to (None)
2012-08-22
05 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Harald Alvestrand
2012-08-22
05 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Jon Peterson
2012-08-22
05 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Ted Hardie
2006-01-17
05 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Amy Vezza
2006-01-17
05 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'RFC 4355' added by Amy Vezza
2006-01-11
05 (System) RFC published
2005-05-16
05 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2005-05-16
05 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2005-05-16
05 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2005-05-16
05 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2005-05-15
05 Allison Mankin State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Allison Mankin
2005-05-15
05 Allison Mankin Note field has been cleared by Allison Mankin
2005-05-13
05 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ted Hardie has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Ted Hardie
2005-05-11
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-enum-msg-05.txt
2005-02-16
05 Harald Alvestrand
[Ballot comment]
Reviewed by Mary Barnes, Gen-ART

Version -04 satisfies my concerns about references for mailed *MS messages, and has also addressed the reviewer's significant ...
2005-02-16
05 Harald Alvestrand [Ballot Position Update] Position for Harald Alvestrand has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Harald Alvestrand
2005-02-14
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-enum-msg-04.txt
2004-11-26
05 Jon Peterson [Ballot Position Update] Position for Jon Peterson has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Jon Peterson
2004-10-28
05 Harald Alvestrand Version -03 does not address the issue of "what does it mean to send an (sms, ems, mms) over email". My DISCUSS stands.
2004-10-21
05 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2004-10-21
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-enum-msg-03.txt
2004-09-03
05 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2004-09-02
2004-09-02
05 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2004-09-02
05 Amy Vezza
[Note]: '- Hayes reviewed and found no problem with sms/mms/ems (3GPP
material) in here (Jul 2004)
- RFC Editor note for problem with abstract.  Submitted ...
2004-09-02
05 Thomas Narten [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Thomas Narten by Thomas Narten
2004-09-02
05 Bert Wijnen [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bert Wijnen by Bert Wijnen
2004-09-02
05 Harald Alvestrand
[Ballot discuss]
This memo specifies how to show that a participant can receive an SMS, EMS or MMS message using the phone system or by ...
2004-09-02
05 Harald Alvestrand [Ballot Position Update] Position for Harald Alvestrand has been changed to Discuss from No Objection by Harald Alvestrand
2004-09-02
05 Harald Alvestrand
[Ballot comment]
Reviewed by Mary Barnes, Gen-ART

Significant comment:

2. Section 4. Security Considersations section needs rewording. Propose to change from:
 
  " An ...
2004-09-02
05 Harald Alvestrand [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Harald Alvestrand by Harald Alvestrand
2004-09-02
05 Margaret Cullen [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Margaret Wasserman by Margaret Wasserman
2004-09-02
05 Bill Fenner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bill Fenner by Bill Fenner
2004-09-02
05 Jon Peterson [Ballot discuss]
In Section 5.3.2, the SMS service is given the enumservice name and type 'ems'. A cut-and-paste error, no doubt. RFC-Ed note is fine.
2004-09-02
05 Jon Peterson [Ballot discuss]
In Section 5.3.2, the SMS service is given the enumservice name and type 'ems'. A cut-and-paste error, no doubt.
2004-09-02
05 Jon Peterson [Ballot Position Update] Position for Jon Peterson has been changed to Discuss from Abstain by Jon Peterson
2004-09-02
05 Jon Peterson [Ballot Position Update] New position, Abstain, has been recorded for Jon Peterson by Jon Peterson
2004-09-02
05 Alex Zinin [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alex Zinin by Alex Zinin
2004-09-01
05 David Kessens [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for David Kessens by David Kessens
2004-08-31
05 Russ Housley
[Ballot comment]
This document uses "e-mail" and "email."  Please pick one spelling.

  Please remove the references ([6]) from the Abstract.

  Section 2 says: ...
2004-08-31
05 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Russ Housley by Russ Housley
2004-08-31
05 Steven Bellovin
[Ballot comment]
Section 3:
To reduce spam and
other unwanted communication other means should be made available.

"Other means" of what?

The security considersations for ...
2004-08-31
05 Amy Vezza [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Steve Bellovin by Amy Vezza
2004-08-30
05 Ted Hardie
[Ballot discuss]
The fax registration lists the URI scheme as "tel", but the same
document that registered "tel" (RFC 2806) also registered "fax".
If this ...
2004-08-30
05 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Ted Hardie by Ted Hardie
2004-08-30
05 Scott Hollenbeck [Ballot Position Update] Position for Scott Hollenbeck has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Scott Hollenbeck
2004-08-30
05 Scott Hollenbeck [Ballot comment]
There probably shouldn't be any references in the abstract.
2004-08-30
05 Scott Hollenbeck [Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck by Scott Hollenbeck
2004-08-28
05 Allison Mankin
[Note]: '- Hayes reviewed and found no problem with sms/mms/ems (3GPP
material) in here (Jul 2004)
- RFC Editor note for problem with abstract.  Submitted ...
2004-08-28
05 Allison Mankin [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Allison Mankin
2004-08-28
05 Allison Mankin Ballot has been issued by Allison Mankin
2004-08-28
05 Allison Mankin Created "Approve" ballot
2004-08-26
05 Allison Mankin [Note]: 'Hayes reviewed and found no problem with sms/mms/ems (3GPP
material) in here (Jul 2004)' added by Allison Mankin
2004-08-26
05 Allison Mankin State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for Writeup by Allison Mankin
2004-08-26
05 Allison Mankin Placed on agenda for telechat - 2004-09-02 by Allison Mankin
2004-08-25
05 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call by system
2004-08-11
05 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2004-08-11
05 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2004-08-11
05 Allison Mankin Last Call was requested by Allison Mankin
2004-08-11
05 Allison Mankin State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup by Allison Mankin
2004-08-11
05 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2004-08-11
05 (System) Last call text was added
2004-08-11
05 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2004-06-28
05 Allison Mankin Note field has been cleared by Allison Mankin
2004-06-28
05 Allison Mankin
When the rev came, it needed a re-rev because a sip: usage had been added
with no supporting spec (s/m/e MS to SIP).  Re-rev is ...
2004-06-23
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-enum-msg-02.txt
2004-05-25
05 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2004-05-25
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-enum-msg-01.txt
2004-04-26
05 Allison Mankin
[Note]: 'WG co-chair  supported re-spinning doc for title clarification and improved security considerations before IETF Last Call.
Still waiting for the revs after four months...' ...
2003-12-24
05 Allison Mankin State Changes to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation by Allison Mankin
2003-12-24
05 Allison Mankin
[Note]: 'WG co-chair  supported re-spinning doc for title clarification and improved security considerations before IETF Last Call.
Should be able to move this doc right ...
2003-12-22
05 Allison Mankin Another review comment:  group messages in the title
is not descriptive. Needs a better title (before last call starts).
2003-12-22
05 Allison Mankin
Revision draft is needed before it goes to the IESG:  include text about DNSSEC and split references.  The Last Call will be forwarded to LEMONADE ...
2003-11-23
05 Allison Mankin State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Allison Mankin
2003-07-08
05 Natalia Syracuse Draft Added by Syracuse, Natalia
2003-06-16
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-enum-msg-00.txt