datatracker.ietf.org
Sign in
Version 5.3.0, 2014-04-12
Report a bug

Liaison Statement: Proposed IETF BFD WG Work on Ethernet LAG

Submission Date: 2012-03-06
From: Routing Area (Stewart Bryant)
To: IEEE 802.1 (Tony Jeffree)
Cc:Eric Gray
The IETF Chair
The IESG
David Ward
Jeffrey Haas
Stewart Bryant
Adrian Farrel
Eric Gray
Dan Romascanu
IETF Liaison Archive
Response Contact: Stewart Bryant
Technical Contact:
Purpose: For information
Liaisons referring to this one: Liaison response to IETF regarding Proposed IETF BFD WG work on Ethernet LAG
Attachments: (none)
Body:
Response Contacts:
Stewart Bryant, IETF Routing Area Director, <stbryant@cisco.com>
Adrian Farrel, IETF Routing Area Director, <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
IETF Liaison Archive, <statements@ietf.org>

Purpose: For Information


Title: Proposed IETF BFD WG Work on Ethernet LAG
-------------------------------------------

We would like to draw your attention to a topic that has been raised in
the IETF's Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) working group.

Operators and vendors are considering how to load-balance IP over the
members of an Ethernet LAG that is presented as a single IP interface.
As part of this, there is a suggestion to run IP/UDP-encapsulated BFD
over each of the group members and to use the Ethernet LAG identifiers
as identifiers in the BFD message exchanges.

This is not currently working group work, and it falls outside the
current scopeof the BFD working group's charter
(http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/bfd/charter/). However, we anticipate
that there will be discussion of the topic at the IETF's meeting in
Paris during the week of 25th March 2012.

The starting point for the discussion in Paris is likely to be an
Internet-Draft that can be found at
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mmm-bfd-on-lags. We must
emphasize that this is an Individual I-D that does not represent the
consensus view of the working group and is not even a working item of
the working group. Additionally, it is a first version of the draft and
might need considerable additional 
work.

At this stage we would welcome your preliminary views on the topic, and
(of course) welcome participation at the meeting in Paris or on the BFD
working group's mailing list that can be accessed from the charter page
(above). We are particularly interested to understand what parameters
and constraints we need to set on this work within the IETF such that
we can deliver the required technical functionality without overlapping

the technical work that the IEEE considers its own purview.

We will send you a further liaison after the Paris meeting to keep you
informed of progress and to let you know our plans.


Stewart Bryant and Adrian Farrel,
IETF Routing Area Directors