Open Specification for Pretty Good Privacy
charter-ietf-openpgp-04

Yes

Paul Wouters
Roman Danyliw

No Objection

Erik Kline
Francesca Palombini
Jim Guichard
John Scudder
Murray Kucherawy
Zaheduzzaman Sarker
Éric Vyncke
(Martin Duke)
(Robert Wilton)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03-00 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Is this charter ready for external review?"

Paul Wouters
Yes
Comment (2023-11-29 for -03-00) Sent 
The proposed work are good items, postponed earlier to focus on the crypto-refresh.
The list is a bit long and ambitious, but I guess that is countered by incomplete and variable Milestones :)
Roman Danyliw
Yes
Comment (2023-11-09 for -03-00) Not sent 
Note: this charter contains a number of links.  When viewed in the "charter review" datatracker page (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-openpgp/), this text will be unrendered Markdown making the text difficult to read.  Please realize that if this charter is approved, it would be shown in the "WG view" of the WG (https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/openpgp/about/) which will render the markdown correctly.
Erik Kline
No Objection
Comment (2023-11-12 for -03-00) Sent 
# Internet AD comments for charter-ietf-openpgp-03-00
CC @ekline

* comment syntax:
  - https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md

## Nits

### "Working Group Process"

* "For all work items will required demonstration of interoperable ..."

  didn't quite scan correctly for me.  Perhaps something like:

  "For all work items, demonstration of interoperability will be required..."
Francesca Palombini
No Objection
Jim Guichard
No Objection
John Scudder
No Objection
Comment (2023-11-29 for -03-00) Sent 
Overall this looks great. I have a couple very small editorial issues you may want to address.

- I think all the uses of quotation marks other than the final two quoted things ("Completion" and "parked WG document") are spurious. I realize this is an exceedingly minor point, but it's a pet peeve.

- I suggest

OLD:
For all work items will required demonstration

NEW:
All work items will require demonstration
Murray Kucherawy
No Objection
Zaheduzzaman Sarker
No Objection
Éric Vyncke
No Objection
Comment (2023-11-25 for -03-00) Sent 
As a starting note, I am a big fan of PGP for its decentralised approach.

Please expand PQC, unsure whether "domain separation" is well understood (at least not to me), HKP/WKD: suggest to use the acronyms *after* their expansions, I like the use of "e.g., use ... as initial input" (except perhaps I would have used "perhaps" rather than "e.g."

Thank you for having "above" in `The WG chairs will periodically poll the WG for which of the topics above to add as milestones` else this could lead to a too flexible too open charter where WG chairs can add *any* item.
Martin Duke Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -03-00) Not sent 

                            

                        
                    

                
            
                
                    

                        

                            Robert Wilton Former IESG member
                        

                        

                            
                            No Objection
                            
                        

                    

                    

                        

                            

                                No Objection 
                                
                                    (for -03-00)
                                
                                
                                    
                                         Not sent