OAuth 2.0 Dynamic Client Registration Protocol
draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-08
| The information below is for an old version of the document |
| Document |
Type |
|
Active Internet-Draft (oauth WG)
|
|
Last updated |
|
2013-03-18
|
|
Stream |
|
IETF
|
|
Intended RFC status |
|
(None)
|
|
Formats |
|
plain text
pdf
html
bibtex
|
|
Reviews |
|
|
| Stream |
WG state
|
|
WG Document
|
|
Document shepherd |
|
None
|
| IESG |
IESG state |
|
I-D Exists
|
|
Consensus Boilerplate |
|
Unknown
|
|
Telechat date |
|
|
|
Responsible AD |
|
(None)
|
|
Send notices to |
|
(None)
|
OAuth Working Group J. Richer, Ed.
Internet-Draft The MITRE Corporation
Intended status: Standards Track J. Bradley
Expires: September 19, 2013 Ping Identity
M.B. Jones
Microsoft
M. Machulak
Newcastle University
March 18, 2013
OAuth 2.0 Dynamic Client Registration Protocol
draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-08
Abstract
This specification defines an endpoint and protocol for dynamic
registration of OAuth 2.0 Clients at an Authorization Server and
methods for the dynamically registered client to manage its
registration.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on September 19, 2013.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
Richer, et al. Expires September 19, 2013 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft oauth-dyn-reg March 2013
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.1. Notational Conventions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.2. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Client Metadata . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.1. Relationship Between Grant Types and Response Types . . . 7
3. Client Registration Endpoint . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
3.1. Client Registration Request . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
3.2. Client Registration Response . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
4. Client Configuration Endpoint . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
4.1. Forming the Client Configuration Endpoint URL . . . . . . 10
4.2. Client Read Request . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
4.3. Client Update Request . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
4.4. Client Delete Request . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
5. Responses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
5.1. Client Information Response . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
5.2. Client Registration Error Response . . . . . . . . . . . 15
6. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
7. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
8. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Appendix A. Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Appendix B. Document History . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
1. Introduction
In some use-case scenarios, it is desirable or necessary to allow
OAuth 2.0 clients to obtain authorization from an OAuth 2.0
authorization server without requiring the two parties to interact
beforehand. Nevertheless, in order for the authorization server to
accurately and securely represent to end-users which client is
seeking authorization to access the end-user's resources, a method
for automatic and unique registration of clients is needed. The
OAuth 2.0 authorization framework does not define how the
relationship between the Client and the Authorization Server is
initialized, or how a given client is assigned a unique Client
Identifier. Historically, this has happened out-of-band from the
OAuth 2.0 protocol. This draft provides a mechanism for a client to
Show full document text