A Common YANG Data Model for Attachment Circuits
draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac-10
| Document | Type | Active Internet-Draft (opsawg WG) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Mohamed Boucadair , Richard Roberts , Oscar Gonzalez de Dios , Samier Barguil , Bo Wu | ||
| Last updated | 2024-04-19 | ||
| Replaces | draft-boro-opsawg-teas-common-ac | ||
| RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Intended RFC status | Proposed Standard | ||
| Formats | |||
| Yang Validation | 0 errors, 0 warnings | ||
| Reviews |
YANGDOCTORS Early review
(of
-02)
by Ebben Aries
On the Right Track
|
||
| Additional resources |
GitHub Repository
Mailing list discussion |
||
| Stream | WG state | WG Document | |
| Document shepherd | Reza Rokui | ||
| IESG | IESG state | I-D Exists | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Yes | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | rrokui@ciena.com |
draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac-10
OPSAWG M. Boucadair, Ed.
Internet-Draft Orange
Intended status: Standards Track R. Roberts, Ed.
Expires: 21 October 2024 Juniper
O. G. D. Dios
Telefonica
S. B. Giraldo
Nokia
B. Wu
Huawei Technologies
19 April 2024
A Common YANG Data Model for Attachment Circuits
draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac-10
Abstract
The document specifies a common Attachment Circuits (ACs) YANG
module, which is designed with the intent to be reusable by other
models. For example, this common model can be reused by service
models to expose ACs as a service, service models that require
binding a service to a set of ACs, network and device models to
provision ACs, etc.
Discussion Venues
This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC.
Discussion of this document takes place on the Operations and
Management Area Working Group Working Group mailing list
(opsawg@ietf.org), which is archived at
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/.
Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at
https://github.com/boucadair/attachment-circuit-model.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on 21 October 2024.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2024 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components
extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as
described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. Conventions and Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3. Relationship to Other AC Data Models . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
4. Description of the AC Common YANG Module . . . . . . . . . . 7
4.1. Features . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
4.2. Identities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
4.3. Reusable Groupings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
5. Common Attachment Circuit YANG Module . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
6. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
7. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
8. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
8.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
8.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
1. Introduction
Connectivity services are provided by networks to customers via
dedicated terminating points (e.g., Service Functions (SFs), Customer
Premises Equipment (CPEs), Autonomous System Border Routers (ASBRs),
data centers gateways, or Internet Exchange Points). A connectivity
service is basically about ensuring data transfer received from (or
destined to) a given terminating point to (or from) other terminating
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
points that belong to the same customer/service, an interconnection
node, or an ancillary node. A set of objectives for the connectivity
service may eventually be negotiated and agreed upon between a
customer a network provider. For that data transfer to take place
within the provider network, it is assumed that adequate setup is
provisioned over the links that connect customer terminating points
and a provider network (a Provider Edge (PE), typically) so that data
can be successfully exchanged over these links. The required setup
is referred to in this document as Attachment Circuits (ACs), while
the underlying link is referred to as "bearer".
This document adheres to the definition of an attachment circuit as
provided in Section 1.2 of [RFC4364], especially:
Routers can be attached to each other, or to end systems, in a
variety of different ways: PPP connections, ATM Virtual Circuits
(VCs), Frame Relay VCs, ethernet interfaces, Virtual Local Area
Networks (VLANs) on ethernet interfaces, GRE tunnels, Layer 2
Tunneling Protocol (L2TP) tunnels, IPsec tunnels, etc. We will
use the term "attachment circuit" to refer generally to some such
means of attaching to a router. An attachment circuit may be the
sort of connection that is usually thought of as a "data link", or
it may be a tunnel of some sort; what matters is that it be
possible for two devices to be network layer peers over the
attachment circuit.
When a customer requests a new value-added service, the service can
be bound to existing attachment circuits or trigger the instantiation
of new attachment circuits. Whether these attachment circuits are
specific to a given service or be shared to deliver a variety of
services is deployment-specific.
An example of attachment circuits is depicted in Figure 1. A
Customer Edge (CE) may be a physical node or a logical entity. A CE
is seen by the network as a peer Service Attachment Point (SAP)
[RFC9408]. CEs may be dedicated to one single service (e.g., Layer 3
Virtual Private Network (VPN) or Layer 2 VPN) or host multiple
services (e.g., Service Functions [RFC7665]). A single AC (as seen
by a network provider) may be bound to one or multiple peer SAPs
(e.g., "CE#1" and "CE#2"). For example, and as discussed in
[RFC4364], multiple CEs can be attached to a PE over the same
attachment circuit. This is typically implemented if the Layer 2
infrastructure between the CE and the network provides a multipoint
service. The same CE may terminate multiple ACs. These ACs may be
over the same or distinct bearers.
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
.-------. .--------------------. .-------.
| +------. | +---AC----+ |
| CE#1 | | | +---AC----+ CE#3 |
'-------' | | | '-------'
+---AC----+ Network |
.-------. | | |
| | | | | .-------.
| CE#2 +------' | +---AC----+ CE#4 |
'-------' | | '----+--'
'-----------+--------' |
| |
'-----------AC----------'
Figure 1: Examples of ACs
This document specifies a common module ("ietf-ac-common") for
attachment circuits (Section 5). The model is designed with the
intent to be reusable by other models and, therefore, ensure
consistent AC structures among modules that manipulate ACs. For
example, the common model can be reused by service models to expose
AC-as-a-Service (ACaaS) (e.g.,
[I-D.ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit]), service models that
require binding a service to a set of ACs (e.g., Network Slice
Service [I-D.ietf-teas-ietf-network-slice-nbi-yang])), network models
to provision ACs (e.g., [I-D.ietf-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit]),
device models, etc.
The common AC module eases data inheritance between modules (e.g.,
from service to network models as per [RFC8969]).
The YANG data model in this document conforms to the Network
Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA) defined in [RFC8342].
2. Conventions and Definitions
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
capitals, as shown here.
The meanings of the symbols in the YANG tree diagrams are defined in
[RFC8340].
LxSM refers to both the Layer 2 Service Model (L2SM) [RFC8466] and
the Layer 3 Service Model (L3SM) [RFC8299].
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
LxNM refers to both the Layer 2 Network Model (L2NM) [RFC9291] and
the Layer 3 Network Model (L3NM) [RFC9182].
This document uses the following terms:
Bearer: A physical or logical link that connects a customer node (or
site) to a provider network.
A bearer can be a wireless or wired link. One or multiple
technologies can be used to build a bearer. The bearer type can
be specified by a customer.
The operator allocates a unique bearer reference to identify a
bearer within its network (e.g., customer line identifier). Such
a reference can be retrieved by a customer and then used in
subsequent service placement requests to unambiguously identify
where a service is to be bound.
The concept of bearer can be generalized to refer to the required
underlying connection for the provisioning of an attachment
circuit.
One or multiple attachment circuits may be hosted over the same
bearer (e.g., multiple Virtual Local Area Networks (VLANs) on the
same bearer that is provided by a physical link).
Network controller: Denotes a functional entity responsible for the
management of the service provider network. One or multiple
network controllers can be deployed in a service provider network.
Service orchestrator: Refers to a functional entity that interacts
with the customer of a network service.
A service orchestrator is typically responsible for the attachment
circuits, the Provider Edge (PE) selection, and requesting the
activation of the requested services to a network controller.
A service orchestrator may interact with one or more network
controllers.
Service provider network: A network that is able to provide network
services (e.g., L2VPN, L3VPN, or Network Slice Services
[RFC9543]).
Service provider: A service provider that offers network services
(e.g., L2VPN, L3VPN, or Network Slice Services).
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
3. Relationship to Other AC Data Models
Figure 2 depicts the relationship between the various AC data models:
* "ietf-ac-common" (Section 5)
* "ietf-bearer-svc" (Section 5.1 of
[I-D.ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit])
* "ietf-ac-svc" (Section 5.2 of
[I-D.ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit])
* "ietf-ac-ntw" ([I-D.ietf-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit])
* "ietf-ac-glue" ([I-D.ietf-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue])
ietf-ac-common
^ ^ ^
| | |
+----------+ | +----------+
| | |
| | |
ietf-ac-svc <--> ietf-bearer-svc |
^ ^ |
| | |
| +------------------------ ietf-ac-ntw
| ^
| |
| |
+----------- ietf-ac-glue -----------+
Figure 2: AC Data Models
"ietf-ac-common" is imported by "ietf-bearer-svc", "ietf-ac-svc", and
"ietf-ac-ntw". Bearers managed using "ietf-bearer-svc" may be
referenced in the service ACs managed using "ietf-ac-svc".
Similarly, a bearer managed using "ietf-bearer-svc" may list the set
of ACs that use that bearer. In order to ease correlation between an
AC service requests and the actual AC provisioned in the network,
"ietf-ac-ntw" uses the AC references exposed by "ietf-ac-svc". To
bind Layer 2 VPN or Layer 3 VPN services with ACs, "ietf-ac-glue"
augments the LxSM and LxNM with AC service references exposed by
"ietf-ac-svc" and AC network references exposed by "ietf-ac-ntw".
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
4. Description of the AC Common YANG Module
The full tree diagram of the module can be generated using the
"pyang" tool [PYANG] with "-f tree --tree-print-groupings" command-
line parameters. That tree is not included here because it is too
long (Section 3.3 of [RFC8340]). Instead, subtrees are provided for
the reader's convenience.
The full tree of the "ietf-ac-common" module is available at
[AC-Common-Tree].
4.1. Features
The module defines the following features:
'layer2-ac': Used to indicate support of ACs with Layer 2
properties.
'layer3-ac': Used to indicate support of ACs with Layer 3
properties.
'server-assigned-reference': Used to indicate support of server-
generated references to access relevant resources.
For example, a bearer request is first created using a name which
is assigned by the client, but if this feature is supported, the
request will also include a server-generated reference. That
reference can be used when requesting the creating of an AC over
the existing bearer.
4.2. Identities
The module defines a set of identities, including the following:
'address-allocation-type': Used to specify the IP address allocation
type in an AC. For example, this identity can used to indicate
whether the provider network provides DHCP service, DHCP relay, or
static addressing. Note that for the IPv6 case, Stateless Address
Autoconfiguration (SLAAC) [RFC4862] can be used.
'local-defined-next-hop': Used to specify next hop actions. For
example, this identity can be used to indicate an action to
discard traffic for a given destination or treat traffic towards
addresses within the specified next-hop prefix as though they are
connected to a local link.
'l2-tunnel-type': Uses to control the Layer 2 tunnel selection for
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
an AC. The current version supports indicating pseudowire,
Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS), and Virtual eXtensible Local
Area Network (VXLAN).
'precedence-type': Used to indicate the redundancy type when
requesting ACs. For example, this identity can be used to tag
primary and secondary ACs.
'bgp-capability': Used to indicate a BGP capability [RFC5492].
Examples of BGP capabilities are Multiprotocol extensions for
BGP-4 [RFC4760], route refresh [RFC2918], graceful restart
[RFC4724], or ADD-PATH [RFC7911].
'role': Used to indicate the type of an AC: User-to-Network
Interface (UNI), Network-to-Network Interface (NNI), or public
NNI.
New administrative status types: In addition to the status types
already defined in [RFC9181], this document defines:
* 'awaiting-validation' to report that a request is pending an
adiministrator approval.
* 'awaiting-processing' to report that a request was approved and
validated, but is awaiting more processing before activation.
* 'admin-prohibited' to report that a request cannot be handled
because of administrative policies.
* 'rejected' to report that a request was rejected reasons not
covered by the other status types.
4.3. Reusable Groupings
The module also defines a set of reusable groupings, including the
following:
'op-instructions' (Figure 3): Defines a set of parameters to specify
scheduling instructions and report related events for a service
request (e.g., AC or bearer).
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
grouping service-status:
+-- status
+-- admin-status
| +-- status? identityref
| +--ro last-change? yang:date-and-time
+--ro oper-status
+--ro status? identityref
+--ro last-change? yang:date-and-time
grouping op-instructions:
+-- requested-start? yang:date-and-time
+-- requested-stop? yang:date-and-time
+--ro actual-start? yang:date-and-time
+--ro actual-stop? yang:date-and-time
Figure 3: Operational Instructions Grouping
Layer 2 encapsulations (Figure 4): Groupings for the following
encapsulation schemes are supported: dot1Q, QinQ, and priority-
tagged.
Layer 2 tunnel services (Figure 4): These groupings are used to
define Layer 2 tunnel services that may be needed for the
activation of an AC. Examples of supported Layer 2 services are
the pseudowire (Section 6.1 of [RFC8077]), VPLS, or VXLAN
[RFC7348].
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
grouping dot1q:
+-- tag-type? identityref
+-- cvlan-id? uint16
grouping priority-tagged:
+-- tag-type? identityref
grouping qinq:
+-- tag-type? identityref
+-- svlan-id? uint16
+-- cvlan-id? uint16
grouping pseudowire:
+-- vcid? uint32
+-- far-end? union
grouping vpls:
+-- vcid? uint32
+-- far-end* union
grouping vxlan:
+-- vni-id? uint32
+-- peer-mode? identityref
+-- peer-ip-address* inet:ip-address
grouping l2-tunnel-service:
+-- type? identityref
+-- pseudowire
| +-- vcid? uint32
| +-- far-end? union
+-- vpls
| +-- vcid? uint32
| +-- far-end* union
+-- vxlan
+-- vni-id? uint32
+-- peer-mode? identityref
+-- peer-ip-address* inet:ip-address
Figure 4: Layer 2 Connection Groupings
Layer 3 address allocation (Figure 5): Defines both IPv4 and IPv6
groupings to specify IP address allocation over an AC. Both
dynamic and static address schemes are supported.
IP connections (Figure 5):: Defines IPv4 and IPv6 groupings for
managing Layer 3 connectivity over an AC. Both basic and more
elaborated IP connection groupings are supported.
grouping ipv4-allocation-type:
+-- prefix-length? uint8
+-- address-allocation-type? identityref
grouping ipv6-allocation-type:
+-- prefix-length? uint8
+-- address-allocation-type? identityref
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
grouping ipv4-connection-basic:
+-- prefix-length? uint8
+-- address-allocation-type? identityref
+-- (allocation-type)?
+--:(dynamic)
+-- (provider-dhcp)?
| +--:(dhcp-service-type)
| +-- dhcp-service-type? enumeration
+-- (dhcp-relay)?
+--:(customer-dhcp-servers)
+-- customer-dhcp-servers
+-- server-ip-address* inet:ipv4-address
grouping ipv6-connection-basic:
+-- prefix-length? uint8
+-- address-allocation-type? identityref
+-- (allocation-type)?
+--:(dynamic)
+-- (provider-dhcp)?
| +--:(dhcp-service-type)
| +-- dhcp-service-type? enumeration
+-- (dhcp-relay)?
+--:(customer-dhcp-servers)
+-- customer-dhcp-servers
+-- server-ip-address* inet:ipv6-address
grouping ipv4-connection:
+-- local-address? inet:ipv4-address
+-- virtual-address? inet:ipv4-address
+-- prefix-length? uint8
+-- address-allocation-type? identityref
+-- (allocation-type)?
+--:(dynamic)
| +-- (address-assign)?
| | +--:(number)
| | | +-- number-of-dynamic-address? uint16
| | +--:(explicit)
| | +-- customer-addresses
| | +-- address-pool* [pool-id]
| | +-- pool-id string
| | +-- start-address inet:ipv4-address
| | +-- end-address? inet:ipv4-address
| +-- (provider-dhcp)?
| | +--:(dhcp-service-type)
| | +-- dhcp-service-type? enumeration
| +-- (dhcp-relay)?
| +--:(customer-dhcp-servers)
| +-- customer-dhcp-servers
| +-- server-ip-address* inet:ipv4-address
+--:(static-addresses)
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
+-- address* [address-id]
+-- address-id string
+-- customer-address? inet:ipv4-address
grouping ipv6-connection:
+-- local-address? inet:ipv6-address
+-- virtual-address? inet:ipv6-address
+-- prefix-length? uint8
+-- address-allocation-type? identityref
+-- (allocation-type)?
+--:(dynamic)
| +-- (address-assign)?
| | +--:(number)
| | | +-- number-of-dynamic-address? uint16
| | +--:(explicit)
| | +-- customer-addresses
| | +-- address-pool* [pool-id]
| | +-- pool-id string
| | +-- start-address inet:ipv6-address
| | +-- end-address? inet:ipv6-address
| +-- (provider-dhcp)?
| | +--:(dhcp-service-type)
| | +-- dhcp-service-type? enumeration
| +-- (dhcp-relay)?
| +--:(customer-dhcp-servers)
| +-- customer-dhcp-servers
| +-- server-ip-address* inet:ipv6-address
+--:(static-addresses)
+-- address* [address-id]
+-- address-id string
+-- customer-address? inet:ipv6-address
Figure 5: Layer 3 Connection Groupings
Routing parameters & OAM (Figure 6): In addition to static routing,
the module supports the following routing protocols: BGP
[RFC4271], OSPF [RFC4577] or [RFC6565], IS-IS
[ISO10589][RFC1195][RFC5308], and RIP [RFC2453]. For all
supported routing protocols, 'address-family' indicates whether
IPv4, IPv6, or both address families are to be activated. For
example, this parameter is used to determine whether RIPv2
[RFC2453], RIP Next Generation (RIPng), or both are to be enabled
[RFC2080]. More details about supported routing groupings are
provided hereafter:
* Authentication: These groupings include the required
information to manage the authentication of OSPF, IS-IS, BGP,
and RIP. Similar to [RFC9182], this version of the common AC
model assumes that parameters specific to the TCP-AO are
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
preconfigured as part of the key chain that is referenced in
the model. No assumption is made about how such a key chain is
preconfigured. However, the structure of the key chain should
cover data nodes beyond those in [RFC8177], mainly SendID and
RecvID (Section 3.1 of [RFC5925]).
* BGP peer groups: Includes a set of parameters to identify a BGP
peer group. Such a group can be defined by providing a local
AS Number (ASN), a customer's ASN, and the address families to
be activated for this group. BGP peer groups can be identified
by a name.
* Basic parameters: These groupings include the minimal set of
routing configuration that is required for the activation of
OSPF, IS-IS, BGP, and RIP.
* Static routing: Parameters to configure an entry of a list of
IP static routing entries.
The 'redundancy-group' grouping lists the groups to which an AC
belongs [RFC9181]. For example, the 'group-id' is used to
associate redundancy or protection constraints of ACs.
grouping bgp-authentication:
+-- authentication
+-- enabled? boolean
+-- keying-material
+-- (option)?
+--:(ao)
| +-- enable-ao? boolean
| +-- ao-keychain? key-chain:key-chain-ref
+--:(md5)
| +-- md5-keychain? key-chain:key-chain-ref
+--:(explicit)
+-- key-id? uint32
+-- key? string
+-- crypto-algorithm? identityref
grouping ospf-authentication:
+-- authentication
+-- enabled? boolean
+-- keying-material
+-- (option)?
+--:(auth-key-chain)
| +-- key-chain? key-chain:key-chain-ref
+--:(auth-key-explicit)
+-- key-id? uint32
+-- key? string
+-- crypto-algorithm? identityref
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
grouping isis-authentication:
+-- authentication
+-- enabled? boolean
+-- keying-material
+-- (option)?
+--:(auth-key-chain)
| +-- key-chain? key-chain:key-chain-ref
+--:(auth-key-explicit)
+-- key-id? uint32
+-- key? string
+-- crypto-algorithm? identityref
grouping rip-authentication:
+-- authentication
+-- enabled? boolean
+-- keying-material
+-- (option)?
+--:(auth-key-chain)
| +-- key-chain? key-chain:key-chain-ref
+--:(auth-key-explicit)
+-- key? string
+-- crypto-algorithm? identityref
grouping bgp-peer-group-without-name:
+-- local-as? inet:as-number
+-- peer-as? inet:as-number
+-- address-family? identityref
grouping bgp-peer-group-with-name:
+-- name? string
+-- local-as? inet:as-number
+-- peer-as? inet:as-number
+-- address-family? identityref
grouping ospf-basic:
+-- address-family? identityref
+-- area-id yang:dotted-quad
+-- metric? uint16
grouping isis-basic:
+-- address-family? identityref
+-- area-address area-address
grouping ipv4-static-rtg-entry:
+-- lan? inet:ipv4-prefix
+-- lan-tag? string
+-- next-hop? union
+-- metric? uint32
grouping ipv4-static-rtg:
+-- ipv4-lan-prefixes* [lan next-hop] {vpn-common:ipv4}?
+-- lan inet:ipv4-prefix
+-- lan-tag? string
+-- next-hop union
+-- metric? uint32
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
+-- status
+-- admin-status
| +-- status? identityref
| +--ro last-change? yang:date-and-time
+--ro oper-status
+--ro status? identityref
+--ro last-change? yang:date-and-time
grouping ipv6-static-rtg-entry:
+-- lan? inet:ipv6-prefix
+-- lan-tag? string
+-- next-hop? union
+-- metric? uint32
grouping ipv6-static-rtg:
+-- ipv6-lan-prefixes* [lan next-hop] {vpn-common:ipv6}?
+-- lan inet:ipv6-prefix
+-- lan-tag? string
+-- next-hop union
+-- metric? uint32
+-- status
+-- admin-status
| +-- status? identityref
| +--ro last-change? yang:date-and-time
+--ro oper-status
+--ro status? identityref
+--ro last-change? yang:date-and-time
grouping bfd:
+-- holdtime? uint32
grouping redundancy-group:
+-- group* [group-id]
+-- group-id? string
+-- precedence? identityref
Figure 6: Layer 3 Connection Groupings
Bandwidth parameters (Figure 7): Bandwidth parameters can be
represented using the Committed Information Rate (CIR), the Excess
Information Rate (EIR), or the Peak Information Rate (PIR).
These parameters can be provided per bandwidth type. Type values
are taken from [RFC9181], e.g.,:
* 'bw-per-cos': The bandwidth is per Class of Service (CoS).
* 'bw-per-site': The bandwidth is to all ACs that belong to the
same site.
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
grouping bandwidth-parameters:
+-- cir? uint64
+-- cbs? uint64
+-- eir? uint64
+-- ebs? uint64
+-- pir? uint64
+-- pbs? uint64
grouping bandwidth-per-type:
+-- bandwidth* [bw-type]
+-- bw-type identityref
+-- (type)?
+--:(per-cos)
| +-- cos* [cos-id]
| +-- cos-id uint8
| +-- cir? uint64
| +-- cbs? uint64
| +-- eir? uint64
| +-- ebs? uint64
| +-- pir? uint64
| +-- pbs? uint64
+--:(other)
+-- cir? uint64
+-- cbs? uint64
+-- eir? uint64
+-- ebs? uint64
+-- pir? uint64
+-- pbs? uint64
Figure 7: Bandwidth Groupings
5. Common Attachment Circuit YANG Module
This module uses types defined in [RFC6991], [RFC8177], and
[RFC9181].
<CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-ac-common@2023-11-13.yang"
module ietf-ac-common {
yang-version 1.1;
namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-ac-common";
prefix ac-common;
import ietf-vpn-common {
prefix vpn-common;
reference
"RFC 9181: A Common YANG Data Model for Layer 2 and Layer 3
VPNs";
}
import ietf-netconf-acm {
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
prefix nacm;
reference
"RFC 8341: Network Configuration Access Control Model";
}
import ietf-inet-types {
prefix inet;
reference
"RFC 6991: Common YANG Data Types, Section 4";
}
import ietf-yang-types {
prefix yang;
reference
"RFC 6991: Common YANG Data Types, Section 3";
}
import ietf-key-chain {
prefix key-chain;
reference
"RFC 8177: YANG Data Model for Key Chains";
}
organization
"IETF OPSAWG (Operations and Management Area Working Group)";
contact
"WG Web: <https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/opsawg/>
WG List: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
Editor: Mohamed Boucadair
<mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
Author: Richard Roberts
<mailto:rroberts@juniper.net>
Author: Oscar Gonzalez de Dios
<mailto:oscar.gonzalezdedios@telefonica.com>
Author: Samier Barguil
<mailto:ssamier.barguil_giraldo@nokia.com>
Author: Bo Wu
<mailto:lana.wubo@huawei.com>";
description
"This YANG module defines a common attachment circuit (AC)
YANG model.
Copyright (c) 2024 IETF Trust and the persons identified as
authors of the code. All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject
to the license terms contained in, the Revised BSD License
set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
Relating to IETF Documents
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX; see the
RFC itself for full legal notices.";
revision 2023-11-13 {
description
"Initial revision.";
reference
"RFC XXXX: A Common YANG Data Model for Attachment Circuits";
}
/****************************Features************************/
feature layer2-ac {
description
"Indicates support of Layer 2 ACs.";
}
feature layer3-ac {
description
"Indicates support of Layer 3 ACs.";
}
feature server-assigned-reference {
description
"This feature indicates support for server-generated references
and use of such references to access related resources.";
}
/****************************Identities************************/
// IP address allocation types
identity address-allocation-type {
description
"Base identity for address allocation type in the AC.";
}
identity provider-dhcp {
base address-allocation-type;
description
"The provider's network provides a DHCP service to the
customer.";
}
identity provider-dhcp-relay {
base address-allocation-type;
description
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 18]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
"The provider's network provides a DHCP relay service to the
customer.";
}
identity provider-dhcp-slaac {
if-feature "vpn-common:ipv6";
base address-allocation-type;
description
"The provider's network provides a DHCP service to the customer
as well as IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration (SLAAC).";
reference
"RFC 4862: IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration";
}
identity static-address {
base address-allocation-type;
description
"The provider's network provides static IP addressing to the
customer.";
}
identity slaac {
if-feature "vpn-common:ipv6";
base address-allocation-type;
description
"The provider's network uses IPv6 SLAAC to provide addressing
to the customer.";
reference
"RFC 4862: IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration";
}
identity dynamic-infra {
base address-allocation-type;
description
"The IP address is dynamically allocated by the hosting
infrastrcture.";
}
// next-hop actions
identity local-defined-next-hop {
description
"Base identity of local defined next hops.";
}
identity discard {
base local-defined-next-hop;
description
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 19]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
"Indicates an action to discard traffic for the corresponding
destination. For example, this can be used to black-hole
traffic.";
}
identity local-link {
base local-defined-next-hop;
description
"Treat traffic towards addresses within the specified next-hop
prefix as though they are connected to a local link.";
}
// Layer 2 tunnel types
identity l2-tunnel-type {
description
"Base identity for Layer 2 tunnel selection for an AC.";
}
identity pseudowire {
base l2-tunnel-type;
description
"Pseudowire tunnel termination for the AC.";
}
identity vpls {
base l2-tunnel-type;
description
"Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS) tunnel termination for
the AC.";
}
identity vxlan {
base l2-tunnel-type;
description
"Virtual eXtensible Local Area Network (VXLAN) tunnel
termination for the AC.";
}
// Tagging precedence
identity precedence-type {
description
"Redundancy type. The service can be created with primary and
secondary tagging.";
}
identity primary {
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 20]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
base precedence-type;
description
"Identifies the main attachment circuit.";
}
identity secondary {
base precedence-type;
description
"Identifies the secondary attachment circuit.";
}
/* BGP Capability Identities. */
identity bgp-capability {
description
"Base identity for a BGP capability.";
reference
"RFC 5492: Capabilities Advertisement with BGP-4";
}
identity mp-bgp {
base bgp-capability;
description
"Multi-protocol extensions to BGP.";
reference
"RFC 4760: Multiprotocol Extentions for BGP-4";
}
identity route-refresh {
base bgp-capability;
description
"Route refresh capability.";
reference
"RFC 2918: Route Refresh Capability for BGP-4.";
}
identity graceful-restart {
base bgp-capability;
description
"Graceful restart capability.";
reference
"RFC 4724: Graceful Restart Mechanism for BGP";
}
identity add-paths {
base bgp-capability;
description
"A capability that allows the advertisement of multiple
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 21]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
paths for the same address prefix without the new paths
implicitly replacing any previous ones.";
reference
"RFC 7911: Advertisement of Multiple Paths in BGP";
}
// AC Type
identity role {
description
"Base identity for the network role of an AC.";
}
identity uni {
base role;
description
"User-to-Network Interface (UNI).";
}
identity nni {
base role;
description
"Network-to-Network Interface (NNI).";
}
identity public-nni {
base role;
description
"Public peering.";
}
// More Admin status types
identity awaiting-validation {
base vpn-common:administrative-status;
description
"This administrative status reflects that a request is
pending an adiministrator approval.";
}
identity awaiting-processing {
base vpn-common:administrative-status;
description
"This administrative status reflects that a request was
approved and validated, but is awaiting more processing
before activation.";
}
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 22]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
identity admin-prohibited {
base vpn-common:administrative-status;
description
"This administrative status reflects that a request cannot
be handled because of administrative policies.";
}
identity rejected {
base vpn-common:administrative-status;
description
"This administrative status reflects that a request was
rejected because, e.g., there are no sufficient resources
or other reasons not covered by the other status types.";
}
/****************************Typedefs************************/
typedef predefined-next-hop {
type identityref {
base local-defined-next-hop;
}
description
"Predefined next-hop designation for locally generated
routes.";
}
typedef area-address {
type string {
pattern '[0-9A-Fa-f]{2}(\.[0-9A-Fa-f]{4}){0,6}';
}
description
"This type defines the area address format.";
}
/************************Reusable groupings********************/
/**** Service Status ****/
grouping service-status {
description
"Service status grouping.";
container status {
description
"Service status.";
container admin-status {
description
"Administrative service status.";
leaf status {
type identityref {
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 23]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
base vpn-common:administrative-status;
}
description
"Administrative service status.";
}
leaf last-change {
type yang:date-and-time;
config false;
description
"Indicates the actual date and time of the service
status change.";
}
}
container oper-status {
config false;
description
"Operational service status.";
uses vpn-common:oper-status-timestamp;
}
}
}
/**** A set of profiles ****/
grouping ac-profile-cfg {
description
"Grouping for AC profile configuration.";
container valid-provider-identifiers {
description
"Container for valid provider profile identifiers.
The profiles only have significance within the service
provider's administrative domain.";
list encryption-profile-identifier {
key "id";
description
"List of encryption profile identifiers.";
leaf id {
type string;
description
"Identification of the encryption profile to be used.";
}
}
list qos-profile-identifier {
key "id";
description
"List of QoS profile identifiers.";
leaf id {
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 24]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
type string;
description
"Identification of the QoS profile to be used.";
}
}
list failure-detection-profile-identifier {
key "id";
description
"List of BFD profile identifiers.";
leaf id {
type string;
description
"Identification of the a failure detection (e.g., BFD)
profile to be used.";
}
}
list forwarding-profile-identifier {
key "id";
description
"List of forwarding profile identifiers.";
leaf id {
type string;
description
"Identification of the forwarding profile to be used.";
}
}
list routing-profile-identifier {
key "id";
description
"List of routing profile identifiers.";
leaf id {
type string;
description
"Identification of the routing profile to be used by
the routing protocols over an AC.";
}
}
nacm:default-deny-write;
}
}
/**** Operational instructions ****/
grouping op-instructions {
description
"Scheduling instructions.";
leaf requested-start {
type yang:date-and-time;
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 25]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
description
"Indicates the requested date and time when the service is
expected to be active.";
}
leaf requested-stop {
type yang:date-and-time;
description
"Indicates the requested date and time when the service is
expected to be disabled.";
}
leaf actual-start {
type yang:date-and-time;
config false;
description
"Indicates the actual date and time when the service
actually was enabled.";
}
leaf actual-stop {
type yang:date-and-time;
config false;
description
"Indicates the actual date and time when the service
actually was disabled.";
}
}
/**** Layer 2 encapsulations ****/
// Dot1q
grouping dot1q {
description
"Defines a grouping for tagged interfaces.";
leaf tag-type {
type identityref {
base vpn-common:tag-type;
}
description
"Tag type.";
}
leaf cvlan-id {
type uint16 {
range "1..4094";
}
description
"VLAN identifier.";
}
}
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 26]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
// priority-tagged
grouping priority-tagged {
description
"Priority tagged.";
leaf tag-type {
type identityref {
base vpn-common:tag-type;
}
description
"Tag type.";
}
}
// QinQ
grouping qinq {
description
"Includes QinQ parameters.";
leaf tag-type {
type identityref {
base vpn-common:tag-type;
}
description
"Tag type.";
}
leaf svlan-id {
type uint16 {
range "1..4094";
}
description
"Service VLAN (S-VLAN) identifier.";
}
leaf cvlan-id {
type uint16 {
range "1..4094";
}
description
"Customer VLAN (C-VLAN) identifier.";
}
}
/**** Layer 2 tunnel services ****/
// pseudowire (PW)
grouping pseudowire {
description
"Includes pseudowire termination parameters.";
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 27]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
leaf vcid {
type uint32;
description
"Indicates a PW or virtual circuit (VC) identifier.";
}
leaf far-end {
type union {
type uint32;
type inet:ip-address;
}
description
"Neighbor reference.";
reference
"RFC 8077: Pseudowire Setup and Maintenance Using the Label
Distribution Protocol (LDP), Section 6.1";
}
}
// VPLS
grouping vpls {
description
"VPLS termination parameters.";
leaf vcid {
type uint32;
description
"VC identifier.";
}
leaf-list far-end {
type union {
type uint32;
type inet:ip-address;
}
description
"Neighbor reference.";
}
}
// VXLAN
grouping vxlan {
description
"VXLAN termination parameters.";
leaf vni-id {
type uint32;
description
"VXLAN Network Identifier (VNI).";
}
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 28]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
leaf peer-mode {
type identityref {
base vpn-common:vxlan-peer-mode;
}
description
"Specifies the VXLAN access mode. By default,
the peer mode is set to 'static-mode'.";
}
leaf-list peer-ip-address {
type inet:ip-address;
description
"List of a peer's IP addresses.";
}
}
// Layer 2 Tunnel service
grouping l2-tunnel-service {
description
"Defines a Layer 2 tunnel termination.";
leaf type {
type identityref {
base l2-tunnel-type;
}
description
"Selects the tunnel termination type for an AC.";
}
container pseudowire {
when "derived-from-or-self(../type, 'ac-common:pseudowire')" {
description
"Only applies when the Layer 2 service type is
'pseudowire'.";
}
description
"Includes pseudowire termination parameters.";
uses pseudowire;
}
container vpls {
when "derived-from-or-self(../type, 'ac-common:vpls')" {
description
"Only applies when the Layer 2 service type is 'vpls'.";
}
description
"VPLS termination parameters.";
uses vpls;
}
container vxlan {
when "derived-from-or-self(../type, 'ac-common:vxlan')" {
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 29]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
description
"Only applies when the Layer 2 service type is 'vxlan'.";
}
description
"VXLAN termination parameters.";
uses vxlan;
}
}
/**** Layer 3 connection *****/
// IPv4 allocation type
grouping ipv4-allocation-type {
description
"IPv4-specific parameters.";
leaf prefix-length {
type uint8 {
range "0..32";
}
description
"Subnet prefix length expressed in bits. It is applied to
both local and customer addresses.";
}
leaf address-allocation-type {
type identityref {
base address-allocation-type;
}
must "not(derived-from-or-self(current(), 'ac-common:slaac') "
+ "or derived-from-or-self(current(), "
+ "'ac-common:provider-dhcp-slaac'))" {
error-message "SLAAC is only applicable to IPv6.";
}
description
"Defines how IPv4 addresses are allocated to the peer site.";
}
}
// IPv6 allocation type
grouping ipv6-allocation-type {
description
"IPv6-specific parameters.";
leaf prefix-length {
type uint8 {
range "0..128";
}
description
"Subnet prefix length expressed in bits. It is applied to
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 30]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
both local and customer addresses.";
}
leaf address-allocation-type {
type identityref {
base address-allocation-type;
}
description
"Defines how IPv6 addresses are allocated to the peer site.";
}
}
// Basic parameters for IPv4 connection
grouping ipv4-connection-basic {
description
"Basic set fof IPv4-specific parameters for the connection.";
uses ipv4-allocation-type;
choice allocation-type {
description
"Choice of the IPv4 address allocation.";
case dynamic {
description
"When the addresses are allocated by DHCP or other dynamic
means local to the infrastructure.";
choice provider-dhcp {
description
"Parameters related to DHCP-allocated addresses. IP
addresses are allocated by DHCP, that is provided by
the operator.";
leaf dhcp-service-type {
type enumeration {
enum server {
description
"Local DHCP server.";
}
enum relay {
description
"Local DHCP relay. DHCP requests are relayed to
a provider's server.";
}
}
description
"Indicates the type of DHCP service to be enabled on
an AC.";
}
}
choice dhcp-relay {
description
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 31]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
"The DHCP relay is provided by the operator.";
container customer-dhcp-servers {
description
"Container for a list of the customer's DHCP servers.";
leaf-list server-ip-address {
type inet:ipv4-address;
description
"IPv4 addresses of the customer's DHCP server.";
}
}
}
}
}
}
// Basic parameters for IPv6 connection
grouping ipv6-connection-basic {
description
"Basic set fof IPv6-specific parameters for the connection.";
uses ipv6-allocation-type;
choice allocation-type {
description
"Choice of the IPv6 address allocation.";
case dynamic {
description
"When the addresses are allocated by DHCP or other dynamic
means local to the infrastructure.";
choice provider-dhcp {
description
"Parameters related to DHCP-allocated addresses.
IP addresses are allocated by DHCP, that is provided
by the operator.";
leaf dhcp-service-type {
type enumeration {
enum server {
description
"Local DHCP server.";
}
enum relay {
description
"Local DHCP relay. DHCP requests are relayed to a
provider's server.";
}
}
description
"Indicates the type of DHCP service to be enabled on
the AC.";
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 32]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
}
}
choice dhcp-relay {
description
"The DHCP relay is provided by the operator.";
container customer-dhcp-servers {
description
"Container for a list of the customer's DHCP servers.";
leaf-list server-ip-address {
type inet:ipv6-address;
description
"IPv6 addresses of the customer's DHCP server.";
}
}
}
}
}
}
// Full parameters for the IPv4 connection
grouping ipv4-connection {
description
"IPv4-specific parameters.";
leaf local-address {
type inet:ipv4-address;
description
"The IP address used at the provider's interface.";
}
leaf virtual-address {
type inet:ipv4-address;
description
"This addresss may be used for redundancy purposes.";
}
uses ipv4-allocation-type;
choice allocation-type {
description
"Choice of the IPv4 address allocation.";
case dynamic {
description
"When the addresses are allocated by DHCP or other
dynamic means local to the infrastructure.";
choice address-assign {
description
"A choice for how IPv4 addresses are assigned.";
case number {
leaf number-of-dynamic-address {
type uint16;
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 33]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
description
"Specifies the number of IP addresses to be assigned
to the customer on the AC.";
}
}
case explicit {
container customer-addresses {
description
"Container for customer addresses to be allocated
using DHCP.";
list address-pool {
key "pool-id";
description
"Describes IP addresses to be dyncamically
allocated.
When only 'start-address' is present, it
represents a single address.
When both 'start-address' and 'end-address' are
specified, it implies a range inclusive of both
addresses.";
leaf pool-id {
type string;
description
"A pool identifier for the address range from
'start-address' to 'end-address'.";
}
leaf start-address {
type inet:ipv4-address;
mandatory true;
description
"Indicates the first address in the pool.";
}
leaf end-address {
type inet:ipv4-address;
description
"Indicates the last address in the pool.";
}
}
}
}
}
choice provider-dhcp {
description
"Parameters related to DHCP-allocated addresses. IP
addresses are allocated by DHCP, which is provided by
the operator.";
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 34]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
leaf dhcp-service-type {
type enumeration {
enum server {
description
"Local DHCP server.";
}
enum relay {
description
"Local DHCP relay. DHCP requests are relayed to
a provider's server.";
}
}
description
"Indicates the type of DHCP service to be enabled on
this AC.";
}
}
choice dhcp-relay {
description
"The DHCP relay is provided by the operator.";
container customer-dhcp-servers {
description
"Container for a list of the customer's DHCP servers.";
leaf-list server-ip-address {
type inet:ipv4-address;
description
"IPv4 addresses of the customer's DHCP server.";
}
}
}
}
case static-addresses {
description
"Lists the IPv4 addresses that are used.";
list address {
key "address-id";
ordered-by user;
description
"Lists the IPv4 addresses that are used. The first
address of the list is the primary address of the
connection.";
leaf address-id {
type string;
description
"An identifier of the static IPv4 address.";
}
leaf customer-address {
type inet:ipv4-address;
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 35]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
description
"An IPv4 address of the customer side.";
}
}
}
}
}
// Full parameters for the IPv6 connection
grouping ipv6-connection {
description
"IPv6-specific parameters.";
leaf local-address {
type inet:ipv6-address;
description
"IPv6 address of the provider side.";
}
leaf virtual-address {
type inet:ipv6-address;
description
"This addresss may be used for redundancy purposes.";
}
uses ipv6-allocation-type;
choice allocation-type {
description
"Choice of the IPv6 address allocation.";
case dynamic {
description
"When the addresses are allocated by DHCP or other
dynamic means local to the infrastructure.";
choice address-assign {
description
"A choice for how IPv6 addresses are assigned.";
case number {
leaf number-of-dynamic-address {
type uint16;
description
"Specifies the number of IP addresses to be
assigned to the customer on this access.";
}
}
case explicit {
container customer-addresses {
description
"Container for customer addresses to be allocated
using DHCP.";
list address-pool {
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 36]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
key "pool-id";
description
"Describes IP addresses to be dyncamically
allocated.
When only 'start-address' is present, it
represents a single address.
When both 'start-address' and 'end-address' are
specified, it implies a range inclusive of both
addresses.";
leaf pool-id {
type string;
description
"A pool identifier for the address range from
'start-address' to 'end-address'.";
}
leaf start-address {
type inet:ipv6-address;
mandatory true;
description
"Indicates the first address in the pool.";
}
leaf end-address {
type inet:ipv6-address;
description
"Indicates the last address in the pool.";
}
}
}
}
}
choice provider-dhcp {
description
"Parameters related to DHCP-allocated addresses.
IP addresses are allocated by DHCP, which is provided
by the operator.";
leaf dhcp-service-type {
type enumeration {
enum server {
description
"Local DHCP server.";
}
enum relay {
description
"Local DHCP relay. DHCP requests are relayed
to a provider's server.";
}
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 37]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
}
description
"Indicates the type of DHCP service to
be enabled on this access.";
}
}
choice dhcp-relay {
description
"The DHCP relay is provided by the operator.";
container customer-dhcp-servers {
description
"Container for a list of the customer's DHCP servers.";
leaf-list server-ip-address {
type inet:ipv6-address;
description
"IPv6 addresses of the customer's DHCP server.";
}
}
}
}
case static-addresses {
description
"Lists the IPv6 addresses that are used.";
list address {
key "address-id";
ordered-by user;
description
"Lists the IPv6 addresses that are used. The first
address of the list is the primary IP address of
the connection.";
leaf address-id {
type string;
description
"An identifier of the static IPv6 address.";
}
leaf customer-address {
type inet:ipv6-address;
description
"An IPv6 address of the customer side.";
}
}
}
}
}
/**** Routing ****/
// Routing authentication
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 38]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
grouping bgp-authentication {
description
"Grouping for BGP authentication parameters.";
container authentication {
description
"Container for BGP authentication parameters.";
leaf enabled {
type boolean;
description
"Enables or disables authentication.";
}
container keying-material {
when "../enabled = 'true'";
description
"Container for describing how a BGP routing session is to
be secured on an AC.";
choice option {
description
"Choice of authentication options.";
case ao {
description
"Uses the TCP Authentication Option (TCP-AO).";
reference
"RFC 5925: The TCP Authentication Option";
leaf enable-ao {
type boolean;
description
"Enables the TCP-AO.";
}
leaf ao-keychain {
type key-chain:key-chain-ref;
description
"Reference to the TCP-AO key chain.";
reference
"RFC 8177: YANG Data Model for Key Chains";
}
}
case md5 {
description
"Uses MD5 to secure the session.";
reference
"RFC 4364: BGP/MPLS IP Virtual Private Networks
(VPNs), Section 13.2";
leaf md5-keychain {
type key-chain:key-chain-ref;
description
"Reference to the MD5 key chain.";
reference
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 39]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
"RFC 8177: YANG Data Model for Key Chains";
}
}
case explicit {
leaf key-id {
type uint32;
description
"Key identifier.";
}
leaf key {
type string;
description
"BGP authentication key.
This model only supports the subset of keys that
are representable as ASCII strings.";
}
leaf crypto-algorithm {
type identityref {
base key-chain:crypto-algorithm;
}
description
"Indicates the cryptographic algorithm associated
with the key.";
}
}
}
}
}
}
grouping ospf-authentication {
description
"Authentication configuration.";
container authentication {
description
"Container for OSPF authentication parameters.";
leaf enabled {
type boolean;
description
"Enables or disables authentication.";
}
container keying-material {
when "../enabled = 'true'";
description
"Container for describing how an OSPF session is to be
secured for this AC.";
choice option {
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 40]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
description
"Options for OSPF authentication.";
case auth-key-chain {
leaf key-chain {
type key-chain:key-chain-ref;
description
"Name of the key chain.";
}
}
case auth-key-explicit {
leaf key-id {
type uint32;
description
"Key identifier.";
}
leaf key {
type string;
description
"OSPF authentication key.
This model only supports the subset of keys that
are representable as ASCII strings.";
}
leaf crypto-algorithm {
type identityref {
base key-chain:crypto-algorithm;
}
description
"Indicates the cryptographic algorithm associated
with the key.";
}
}
}
}
}
}
grouping isis-authentication {
description
"IS-IS authentication configuration.";
container authentication {
description
"Container for IS-IS authentication parameters.";
leaf enabled {
type boolean;
description
"Enables or disables authentication.";
}
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 41]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
container keying-material {
when "../enabled = 'true'";
description
"Container for describing how an IS-IS session is secured
over an AC.";
choice option {
description
"Options for IS-IS authentication.";
case auth-key-chain {
leaf key-chain {
type key-chain:key-chain-ref;
description
"Name of the key chain.";
}
}
case auth-key-explicit {
leaf key-id {
type uint32;
description
"Key identifier.";
}
leaf key {
type string;
description
"IS-IS authentication key.
This model only supports the subset of keys that
are representable as ASCII strings.";
}
leaf crypto-algorithm {
type identityref {
base key-chain:crypto-algorithm;
}
description
"Indicates the cryptographic algorithm associated
with the key.";
}
}
}
}
}
}
grouping rip-authentication {
description
"RIP authentication configuration.";
container authentication {
description
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 42]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
"Container for RIP authentication parameters.";
leaf enabled {
type boolean;
description
"Enables or disables authentication.";
}
container keying-material {
when "../enabled = 'true'";
description
"Container for describing how a RIP session is to be
secured on this AC.";
choice option {
description
"Specifies the authentication
scheme.";
case auth-key-chain {
leaf key-chain {
type key-chain:key-chain-ref;
description
"Name of the key chain.";
}
}
case auth-key-explicit {
leaf key {
type string;
description
"RIP authentication key.
This model only supports the subset of keys that
are representable as ASCII strings.";
}
leaf crypto-algorithm {
type identityref {
base key-chain:crypto-algorithm;
}
description
"Indicates the cryptographic algorithm associated
with the key.";
}
}
}
}
}
}
// Basic routing parameters
grouping bgp-peer-group-without-name {
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 43]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
description
"Identifies a BGP peer-group configured on the local system.";
leaf local-as {
type inet:as-number;
description
"Indicates a local AS Number (ASN). This ASN is exposed
to a customer so that it knows which ASN to use
to set up a BGP session.";
}
leaf peer-as {
type inet:as-number;
description
"Indicates the customer's ASN when the customer
requests BGP routing.";
}
leaf address-family {
type identityref {
base vpn-common:address-family;
}
description
"This node contains the address families to be activated.
'dual-stack' means that both IPv4 and IPv6 will be
activated.";
}
}
grouping bgp-peer-group-with-name {
description
"Identifies a BGP peer-group configured on the local system -
identified by a peer-group name.";
leaf name {
type string;
description
"Name of the BGP peer-group.";
}
uses bgp-peer-group-without-name;
}
grouping ospf-basic {
description
"Configuration specific to OSPF.";
leaf address-family {
type identityref {
base vpn-common:address-family;
}
description
"Indicates whether IPv4, IPv6, or both are to be activated.";
}
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 44]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
leaf area-id {
type yang:dotted-quad;
mandatory true;
description
"Area ID.";
reference
"RFC 4577: OSPF as the Provider/Customer Edge Protocol
for BGP/MPLS IP Virtual Private Networks
(VPNs), Section 4.2.3
RFC 6565: OSPFv3 as a Provider Edge to Customer Edge
(PE-CE) Routing Protocol, Section 4.2";
}
leaf metric {
type uint16;
description
"Metric of the AC. It is used in the routing state
calculation and path selection.";
}
}
grouping isis-basic {
description
"Basic configuration specific to IS-IS.";
leaf address-family {
type identityref {
base vpn-common:address-family;
}
description
"Indicates whether IPv4, IPv6, or both are to be activated.";
}
leaf area-address {
type area-address;
mandatory true;
description
"Area address.";
}
}
// Static routing
grouping ipv4-static-rtg-entry {
description
"Paramters to configure a specific IPv4 static routing entry.";
leaf lan {
type inet:ipv4-prefix;
description
"LAN prefix.";
}
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 45]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
leaf lan-tag {
type string;
description
"Internal tag to be used in service policies.";
}
leaf next-hop {
type union {
type inet:ip-address;
type predefined-next-hop;
}
description
"The next hop that is to be used for the static route.
This may be specified as an IP address or a
predefined next-hop type (e.g., 'discard' or
'local-link').";
}
leaf metric {
type uint32;
description
"Indicates the metric associated with the static route.";
}
}
grouping ipv4-static-rtg {
description
"Configuration specific to IPv4 static routing.";
list ipv4-lan-prefixes {
if-feature "vpn-common:ipv4";
key "lan next-hop";
description
"List of LAN prefixes for the site.";
uses ipv4-static-rtg-entry;
uses ac-common:service-status;
}
}
grouping ipv6-static-rtg-entry {
description
"Paramters to configure a specific IPv6 static routing entry.";
leaf lan {
type inet:ipv6-prefix;
description
"LAN prefixes.";
}
leaf lan-tag {
type string;
description
"Internal tag to be used in service (e.g., VPN) policies.";
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 46]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
}
leaf next-hop {
type union {
type inet:ip-address;
type predefined-next-hop;
}
description
"The next hop that is to be used for the static route.
This may be specified as an IP address or a predefined
next-hop type (e.g., 'discard' or 'local-link').";
}
leaf metric {
type uint32;
description
"Indicates the metric associated with the static route.";
}
}
grouping ipv6-static-rtg {
description
"Configuration specific to IPv6 static routing.";
list ipv6-lan-prefixes {
if-feature "vpn-common:ipv6";
key "lan next-hop";
description
"List of LAN prefixes for the site.";
uses ipv6-static-rtg-entry;
uses ac-common:service-status;
}
}
// OAM
grouping bfd {
description
"A grouping for basic BFD.";
leaf holdtime {
type uint32;
units "milliseconds";
description
"Expected BFD holdtime.
The customer may impose some fixed values
for the holdtime period if the provider allows
the customer to use this function.
If the provider doesn't allow the customer to
use this function, fixed values will not be set.";
reference
"RFC 5880: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD),
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 47]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
Section 6.8.18";
}
}
// redundancy
grouping redundancy-group {
description
"A grouping for redundancy group.";
list group {
key "group-id";
description
"List of group-ids.";
leaf group-id {
type string;
description
"Indicates the group-id to which the AC belongs.";
}
leaf precedence {
type identityref {
base ac-common:precedence-type;
}
description
"Defines redundancy of an AC.";
}
}
}
// QoS
grouping bandwidth-parameters {
description
"A grouping for bandwidth parameters.";
leaf cir {
type uint64;
units "bps";
description
"Committed Information Rate (CIR). The maximum number of bits
that a port can receive or send during one second over
an interface.";
}
leaf cbs {
type uint64;
units "bytes";
description
"Committed Burst Size (CBS). CBS controls the bursty nature
of the traffic. Traffic that does not use the configured
CIR accumulates credits until the credits reach the
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 48]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
configured CBS.";
}
leaf eir {
type uint64;
units "bps";
description
"Excess Information Rate (EIR), i.e., excess frame delivery
allowed not subject to a Service Level Agreement (SLA).
The traffic rate can be limited by EIR.";
}
leaf ebs {
type uint64;
units "bytes";
description
"Excess Burst Size (EBS). The bandwidth available for burst
traffic from the EBS is subject to the amount of bandwidth
that is accumulated during periods when traffic allocated
by the EIR policy is not used.";
}
leaf pir {
type uint64;
units "bps";
description
"Peak Information Rate (PIR), i.e., maximum frame delivery
allowed. It is equal to or less than sum of CIR and EIR.";
}
leaf pbs {
type uint64;
units "bytes";
description
"Peak Burst Size (PBS).";
}
}
grouping bandwidth-per-type {
description
"Grouping for bandwidth per type.";
list bandwidth {
key "bw-type";
description
"List for bandwidth per type data nodes.";
leaf bw-type {
type identityref {
base vpn-common:bw-type;
}
description
"Indicates the bandwidth type.";
}
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 49]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
choice type {
description
"Choice based upon bandwidth type.";
case per-cos {
description
"Bandwidth per CoS.";
list cos {
key "cos-id";
description
"List of Class of Services.";
leaf cos-id {
type uint8;
description
"Identifier of the CoS, indicated by a Differentiated
Services Code Point (DSCP) or a CE-CLAN CoS (802.1p)
value in the service frame.";
reference
"IEEE Std 802.1Q: Bridges and Bridged Networks";
}
uses bandwidth-parameters;
}
}
case other {
description
"Other bandwidth types.";
uses bandwidth-parameters;
}
}
}
}
}
<CODE ENDS>
6. Security Considerations
This section uses the template described in Section 3.7 of
[I-D.ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis].
The YANG module specified in this document defines schema for data
that is designed to be accessed via network management protocols such
as NETCONF [RFC6241] or RESTCONF [RFC8040]. The lowest NETCONF layer
is the secure transport layer, and the mandatory-to-implement secure
transport is Secure Shell (SSH) [RFC6242]. The lowest RESTCONF layer
is HTTPS, and the mandatory-to-implement secure transport is TLS
[RFC8446].
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 50]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
The Network Configuration Access Control Model (NACM) [RFC8341]
provides the means to restrict access for particular NETCONF or
RESTCONF users to a preconfigured subset of all available NETCONF or
RESTCONF protocol operations and content.
The "ietf-ac-common" module defines a set of identities, types, and
groupings. These nodes are intended to be reused by other YANG
modules. The module by itself does not expose any data nodes that
are writable, data nodes that contain read-only state, or RPCs.
YANG modules that use the groupings that are defined in this document
should identify the corresponding security considerations. For
example, reusing some of these groupings will expose privacy-related
information (e.g., 'ipv6-lan-prefixes' or 'ipv4-lan-prefixes').
Disclosing such information may be considered a violation of the
customer-provider trust relationship.
Several groupings ('bgp-authentication', 'ospf-authentication',
'isis-authentication', and 'rip-authentication') rely upon [RFC8177]
for authentication purposes. As such, modules that will reuse these
groupings will inherit the security considerations discussed in
Section 5 of [RFC8177]. Also, these groupings support supplying
explicit keys as strings in ASCII format. The use of keys in
hexadecimal string format would afford greater key entropy with the
same number of key- string octets. However, such a format is not
included in this version of the common AC model, because it is not
supported by the underlying device modules (e.g., [RFC8695]).
7. IANA Considerations
IANA is requested to register the following URI in the "ns"
subregistry within the "IETF XML Registry" [RFC3688]:
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-ac-common
Registrant Contact: The IESG.
XML: N/A; the requested URI is an XML namespace.
IANA is requested to register the following YANG module in the "YANG
Module Names" subregistry [RFC6020] within the "YANG Parameters"
registry:
Name: ietf-ac-common
Namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-ac-common
Prefix: ac-common
Maintained by IANA? N
Reference: RFC XXXX
8. References
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 51]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
8.1. Normative References
[ISO10589] ISO, "Information technology - Telecommunications and
information exchange between systems - Intermediate System
to Intermediate System intra-domain routeing information
exchange protocol for use in conjunction with the protocol
for providing the connectionless-mode network service
(ISO8473)", 2002,
<https://www.iso.org/standard/30932.html>.
[RFC1195] Callon, R., "Use of OSI IS-IS for routing in TCP/IP and
dual environments", RFC 1195, DOI 10.17487/RFC1195,
December 1990, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1195>.
[RFC2080] Malkin, G. and R. Minnear, "RIPng for IPv6", RFC 2080,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2080, January 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2080>.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2119>.
[RFC2453] Malkin, G., "RIP Version 2", STD 56, RFC 2453,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2453, November 1998,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2453>.
[RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3688>.
[RFC4271] Rekhter, Y., Ed., Li, T., Ed., and S. Hares, Ed., "A
Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)", RFC 4271,
DOI 10.17487/RFC4271, January 2006,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4271>.
[RFC4577] Rosen, E., Psenak, P., and P. Pillay-Esnault, "OSPF as the
Provider/Customer Edge Protocol for BGP/MPLS IP Virtual
Private Networks (VPNs)", RFC 4577, DOI 10.17487/RFC4577,
June 2006, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4577>.
[RFC5308] Hopps, C., "Routing IPv6 with IS-IS", RFC 5308,
DOI 10.17487/RFC5308, October 2008,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5308>.
[RFC5492] Scudder, J. and R. Chandra, "Capabilities Advertisement
with BGP-4", RFC 5492, DOI 10.17487/RFC5492, February
2009, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5492>.
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 52]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
[RFC5925] Touch, J., Mankin, A., and R. Bonica, "The TCP
Authentication Option", RFC 5925, DOI 10.17487/RFC5925,
June 2010, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5925>.
[RFC6020] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for
the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6020,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6020, October 2010,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6020>.
[RFC6241] Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed.,
and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol
(NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6241>.
[RFC6242] Wasserman, M., "Using the NETCONF Protocol over Secure
Shell (SSH)", RFC 6242, DOI 10.17487/RFC6242, June 2011,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6242>.
[RFC6565] Pillay-Esnault, P., Moyer, P., Doyle, J., Ertekin, E., and
M. Lundberg, "OSPFv3 as a Provider Edge to Customer Edge
(PE-CE) Routing Protocol", RFC 6565, DOI 10.17487/RFC6565,
June 2012, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6565>.
[RFC6991] Schoenwaelder, J., Ed., "Common YANG Data Types",
RFC 6991, DOI 10.17487/RFC6991, July 2013,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6991>.
[RFC7348] Mahalingam, M., Dutt, D., Duda, K., Agarwal, P., Kreeger,
L., Sridhar, T., Bursell, M., and C. Wright, "Virtual
eXtensible Local Area Network (VXLAN): A Framework for
Overlaying Virtualized Layer 2 Networks over Layer 3
Networks", RFC 7348, DOI 10.17487/RFC7348, August 2014,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7348>.
[RFC8040] Bierman, A., Bjorklund, M., and K. Watsen, "RESTCONF
Protocol", RFC 8040, DOI 10.17487/RFC8040, January 2017,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8040>.
[RFC8077] Martini, L., Ed. and G. Heron, Ed., "Pseudowire Setup and
Maintenance Using the Label Distribution Protocol (LDP)",
STD 84, RFC 8077, DOI 10.17487/RFC8077, February 2017,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8077>.
[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8174>.
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 53]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
[RFC8177] Lindem, A., Ed., Qu, Y., Yeung, D., Chen, I., and J.
Zhang, "YANG Data Model for Key Chains", RFC 8177,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8177, June 2017,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8177>.
[RFC8341] Bierman, A. and M. Bjorklund, "Network Configuration
Access Control Model", STD 91, RFC 8341,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8341, March 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8341>.
[RFC8342] Bjorklund, M., Schoenwaelder, J., Shafer, P., Watsen, K.,
and R. Wilton, "Network Management Datastore Architecture
(NMDA)", RFC 8342, DOI 10.17487/RFC8342, March 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8342>.
[RFC8446] Rescorla, E., "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol
Version 1.3", RFC 8446, DOI 10.17487/RFC8446, August 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8446>.
[RFC9181] Barguil, S., Gonzalez de Dios, O., Ed., Boucadair, M.,
Ed., and Q. Wu, "A Common YANG Data Model for Layer 2 and
Layer 3 VPNs", RFC 9181, DOI 10.17487/RFC9181, February
2022, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9181>.
8.2. Informative References
[AC-Common-Tree]
"Full Common Attachment Circuit Tree Structure", 2023,
<https://github.com/boucadair/attachment-circuit-
model/blob/main/yang/full-trees/ac-common-with-
groupings.txt>.
[I-D.ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis]
Bierman, A., Boucadair, M., and Q. Wu, "Guidelines for
Authors and Reviewers of Documents Containing YANG Data
Models", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-
netmod-rfc8407bis-11, 18 April 2024,
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netmod-
rfc8407bis-11>.
[I-D.ietf-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue]
Boucadair, M., Roberts, R., Barguil, S., and O. G. de
Dios, "A YANG Data Model for Augmenting VPN Service and
Network Models with Attachment Circuits", Work in
Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-
glue-09, 11 April 2024,
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-opsawg-
ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue-09>.
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 54]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
[I-D.ietf-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit]
Boucadair, M., Roberts, R., de Dios, O. G., Barguil, S.,
and B. Wu, "A Network YANG Data Model for Attachment
Circuits", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-
opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit-08, 11 April 2024,
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-opsawg-
ntw-attachment-circuit-08>.
[I-D.ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit]
Boucadair, M., Roberts, R., de Dios, O. G., Barguil, S.,
and B. Wu, "YANG Data Models for Bearers and 'Attachment
Circuits'-as-a-Service (ACaaS)", Work in Progress,
Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit-
10, 11 April 2024, <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/
draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit-10>.
[I-D.ietf-teas-ietf-network-slice-nbi-yang]
Wu, B., Dhody, D., Rokui, R., Saad, T., and J. Mullooly,
"A YANG Data Model for the RFC 9543 Network Slice
Service", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-
teas-ietf-network-slice-nbi-yang-10, 16 March 2024,
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-teas-
ietf-network-slice-nbi-yang-10>.
[PYANG] "pyang", 2023, <https://github.com/mbj4668/pyang>.
[RFC2918] Chen, E., "Route Refresh Capability for BGP-4", RFC 2918,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2918, September 2000,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2918>.
[RFC4364] Rosen, E. and Y. Rekhter, "BGP/MPLS IP Virtual Private
Networks (VPNs)", RFC 4364, DOI 10.17487/RFC4364, February
2006, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4364>.
[RFC4724] Sangli, S., Chen, E., Fernando, R., Scudder, J., and Y.
Rekhter, "Graceful Restart Mechanism for BGP", RFC 4724,
DOI 10.17487/RFC4724, January 2007,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4724>.
[RFC4760] Bates, T., Chandra, R., Katz, D., and Y. Rekhter,
"Multiprotocol Extensions for BGP-4", RFC 4760,
DOI 10.17487/RFC4760, January 2007,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4760>.
[RFC4862] Thomson, S., Narten, T., and T. Jinmei, "IPv6 Stateless
Address Autoconfiguration", RFC 4862,
DOI 10.17487/RFC4862, September 2007,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4862>.
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 55]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
[RFC7665] Halpern, J., Ed. and C. Pignataro, Ed., "Service Function
Chaining (SFC) Architecture", RFC 7665,
DOI 10.17487/RFC7665, October 2015,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7665>.
[RFC7911] Walton, D., Retana, A., Chen, E., and J. Scudder,
"Advertisement of Multiple Paths in BGP", RFC 7911,
DOI 10.17487/RFC7911, July 2016,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7911>.
[RFC8299] Wu, Q., Ed., Litkowski, S., Tomotaki, L., and K. Ogaki,
"YANG Data Model for L3VPN Service Delivery", RFC 8299,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8299, January 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8299>.
[RFC8340] Bjorklund, M. and L. Berger, Ed., "YANG Tree Diagrams",
BCP 215, RFC 8340, DOI 10.17487/RFC8340, March 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8340>.
[RFC8466] Wen, B., Fioccola, G., Ed., Xie, C., and L. Jalil, "A YANG
Data Model for Layer 2 Virtual Private Network (L2VPN)
Service Delivery", RFC 8466, DOI 10.17487/RFC8466, October
2018, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8466>.
[RFC8695] Liu, X., Sarda, P., and V. Choudhary, "A YANG Data Model
for the Routing Information Protocol (RIP)", RFC 8695,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8695, February 2020,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8695>.
[RFC8969] Wu, Q., Ed., Boucadair, M., Ed., Lopez, D., Xie, C., and
L. Geng, "A Framework for Automating Service and Network
Management with YANG", RFC 8969, DOI 10.17487/RFC8969,
January 2021, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8969>.
[RFC9182] Barguil, S., Gonzalez de Dios, O., Ed., Boucadair, M.,
Ed., Munoz, L., and A. Aguado, "A YANG Network Data Model
for Layer 3 VPNs", RFC 9182, DOI 10.17487/RFC9182,
February 2022, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9182>.
[RFC9291] Boucadair, M., Ed., Gonzalez de Dios, O., Ed., Barguil,
S., and L. Munoz, "A YANG Network Data Model for Layer 2
VPNs", RFC 9291, DOI 10.17487/RFC9291, September 2022,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9291>.
[RFC9408] Boucadair, M., Ed., Gonzalez de Dios, O., Barguil, S., Wu,
Q., and V. Lopez, "A YANG Network Data Model for Service
Attachment Points (SAPs)", RFC 9408, DOI 10.17487/RFC9408,
June 2023, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9408>.
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 56]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
[RFC9543] Farrel, A., Ed., Drake, J., Ed., Rokui, R., Homma, S.,
Makhijani, K., Contreras, L., and J. Tantsura, "A
Framework for Network Slices in Networks Built from IETF
Technologies", RFC 9543, DOI 10.17487/RFC9543, March 2024,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9543>.
Acknowledgments
The document reuses many of the structures that were defined in
[RFC9181] and [RFC9182].
Thanks to Ebben Aries for the YANG Doctors review, Andy Smith and
Gyanh Mishra for the rtg-dir reviews.
Contributors
Victor Lopez
Nokia
Email: victor.lopez@nokia.com
Ivan Bykov
Ribbon Communications
Email: Ivan.Bykov@rbbn.com
Qin Wu
Huawei
Email: bill.wu@huawei.com
Kenichi Ogaki
KDDI
Email: ke-oogaki@kddi.com
Luis Angel Munoz
Vodafone
Email: luis-angel.munoz@vodafone.com
Authors' Addresses
Mohamed Boucadair (editor)
Orange
Email: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 57]
Internet-Draft Common Attachment Circuit YANG April 2024
Richard Roberts (editor)
Juniper
Email: rroberts@juniper.net
Oscar Gonzalez de Dios
Telefonica
Email: oscar.gonzalezdedios@telefonica.com
Samier Barguil Giraldo
Nokia
Email: samier.barguil_giraldo@nokia.com
Bo Wu
Huawei Technologies
Email: lana.wubo@huawei.com
Boucadair, et al. Expires 21 October 2024 [Page 58]