Early Review of draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac-05
review-ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac-05-rtgdir-early-smith-2024-03-21-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 14) | |
Type | Early Review | |
Team | Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir) | |
Deadline | 2024-03-08 | |
Requested | 2024-02-16 | |
Requested by | Tianran Zhou | |
Authors | Mohamed Boucadair , Richard Roberts , Oscar Gonzalez de Dios , Samier Barguil , Bo Wu | |
I-D last updated | 2024-03-21 | |
Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Early review of -05
by Andy Smith
(diff)
Yangdoctors Early review of -02 by Ebben Aries (diff) Genart Last Call review of -13 by Behcet Sarikaya (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -13 by Watson Ladd (diff) |
|
Comments |
There are four related drafts: draft-ietf-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit-05 draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit-06 draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac-05 draft-ietf-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue-06 You may consider them together. |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Andy Smith |
State | Completed | |
Request | Early review on draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac by Routing Area Directorate Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/TdxE_E9OECbAfSPpR4LyHR5ZY7g | |
Reviewed revision | 05 (document currently at 14) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2024-03-21 |
review-ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac-05-rtgdir-early-smith-2024-03-21-00
Draft is well written and easy to understand. It solves a problem that is understood. I see no reason it shouldn't proceed.