Skip to main content

Early Review of draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac-05
review-ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac-05-rtgdir-early-smith-2024-03-21-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 11)
Type Early Review
Team Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir)
Deadline 2024-03-08
Requested 2024-02-16
Requested by Tianran Zhou
Authors Mohamed Boucadair , Richard Roberts , Oscar Gonzalez de Dios , Samier Barguil , Bo Wu
I-D last updated 2024-03-21
Completed reviews Rtgdir Early review of -05 by Andy Smith (diff)
Yangdoctors Early review of -02 by Ebben Aries (diff)
Comments
There are four related drafts:
draft-ietf-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit-05
draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit-06
draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac-05
draft-ietf-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue-06
You may consider them together.
Assignment Reviewer Andy Smith
State Completed
Request Early review on draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac by Routing Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/TdxE_E9OECbAfSPpR4LyHR5ZY7g
Reviewed revision 05 (document currently at 11)
Result Ready
Completed 2024-03-21
review-ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac-05-rtgdir-early-smith-2024-03-21-00
Draft is well written and easy to understand.   It solves a problem that is
understood.   I see no reason it shouldn't proceed.