Last Call Review of draft-carpenter-rfced-iab-charter-05
review-carpenter-rfced-iab-charter-05-intdir-lc-halley-2022-02-10-00
| Request | Review of | draft-carpenter-rfced-iab-charter |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 09) | |
| Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
| Team | Internet Area Directorate (intdir) | |
| Deadline | 2022-03-07 | |
| Requested | 2022-02-09 | |
| Requested by | Lars Eggert | |
| Authors | Brian E. Carpenter | |
| I-D last updated | 2022-06-30 (Latest revision 2022-04-01) | |
| Completed reviews |
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -05
by Yoav Nir
(diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -05 by Pete Resnick (diff) Intdir IETF Last Call review of -05 by Bob Halley (diff) Iotdir IETF Last Call review of -05 by Samita Chakrabarti (diff) Tsvart IETF Last Call review of -05 by Joerg Ott (diff) Artart IETF Last Call review of -08 by Paul Kyzivat (diff) I18ndir IETF Last Call review of -05 by Takahiro Nemoto (diff) |
|
| Comments |
We're trying to maximize the reviews for documents associated with the change in the RFC Editor model. Hence the request to review these pretty short documents, even though they may not need a review from a technical perspective. |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Bob Halley |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-carpenter-rfced-iab-charter by Internet Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/Gu_k_m32WMbG2VCOtc4d2dSEqDc | |
| Reviewed revision | 05 (document currently at 09) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2022-02-10 |
review-carpenter-rfced-iab-charter-05-intdir-lc-halley-2022-02-10-00
I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-carpenter-rfced-iab-charter. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more details on the INT Directorate, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/>. Based on my review, if I was on the IESG I would ballot this document as YES. This document does not have INT area technical content. I did not find any issues with the document.