Last Call Review of draft-carpenter-rfced-iab-charter-05
review-carpenter-rfced-iab-charter-05-iotdir-lc-chakrabarti-2022-02-10-00

Request Review of draft-carpenter-rfced-iab-charter
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 09)
Type Last Call Review
Team Internet of Things Directorate (iotdir)
Deadline 2022-03-07
Requested 2022-02-09
Requested by Lars Eggert
Authors Brian E. Carpenter
I-D last updated 2022-02-10
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -05 by Yoav Nir (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -05 by Pete Resnick (diff)
Intdir Last Call review of -05 by Bob Halley (diff)
Iotdir Last Call review of -05 by Samita Chakrabarti (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -05 by Joerg Ott (diff)
Artart Last Call review of -08 by Paul Kyzivat (diff)
I18ndir Last Call review of -05 by Takahiro Nemoto (diff)
Comments 
We're trying to maximize the reviews for documents associated with the change in the RFC Editor model. Hence the request to review these pretty short documents, even though they may not need a review from a technical perspective.
Assignment Reviewer Samita Chakrabarti
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-carpenter-rfced-iab-charter by Internet of Things Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iot-directorate/ZiiviBi3NsTG-iC-wFFxD3o356Q
Reviewed revision 05 (document currently at 09)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2022-02-10
review-carpenter-rfced-iab-charter-05-iotdir-lc-chakrabarti-2022-02-10-00
I have reviewed  the document. Looks  simple and fine.
I have a question :  Since it is proposing to amend RFC 2850 with a reference
to an I.D. " The RFC Editor function is defined under the authority of the IAB
by
   [I-D.iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model]", I am wondering  if this document has any
   dependency on I-D.iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model becoming a RFC?  Are they
   progressing in parallel?
If this  I.D. reference is not an issue, this document is ready  from my point
of view.