Telechat Review of draft-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust-09
review-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust-09-dnsdir-telechat-huston-2024-07-08-00
Request | Review of | draft-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 09) | |
Type | Telechat Review | |
Team | DNS Directorate (dnsdir) | |
Deadline | 2024-08-06 | |
Requested | 2024-07-08 | |
Authors | Joel M. Halpern , Jay Daley | |
I-D last updated | 2024-10-30 (Latest revision 2024-06-20) | |
Completed reviews |
Genart IETF Last Call review of -08
by Susan Hares
(diff)
Artart IETF Last Call review of -08 by Julian Reschke (diff) Secdir IETF Last Call review of -08 by Vincent Roca (diff) Dnsdir IETF Last Call review of -08 by Geoff Huston (diff) Dnsdir Telechat review of -09 by Geoff Huston |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Geoff Huston |
State | Completed | |
Request | Telechat review on draft-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust by DNS Directorate Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsdir/v9KFibMRbXb2GJT5oIhhQbcQ76U | |
Reviewed revision | 09 | |
Result | Almost ready | |
Completed | 2024-07-08 |
review-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust-09-dnsdir-telechat-huston-2024-07-08-00
In my reciew of the -08 version noted some issues that I felt could benefit from further clarification in Section 2.3 as to the circumstances when IETF antitrust provisions apply (points 1 and 2 in the review https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust-08-dnsdir-lc-huston-2024-05-20/). The text of the draft is unaltered from the -08 version and my comments about further clarity of the intended scope of application still apply. I also noted that I felt that the topic to avoic (section 4.1) should be noted as an illustrative list, and not necessarily an exhaustive list. Finally I also noted some uncertainty relating to the expentation to "behave lawfully": "A participant participating exclusively by mail in an IETF activity, and never physically leaving their country of domicile must behave "lawfully" according to the laws of which jurisdiction?" None of these review vcomments have been addressed in -09 and accordinly I do not believe that this document is "ready"