Skip to main content

Telechat Review of draft-ietf-acme-acme-07
review-ietf-acme-acme-07-opsdir-telechat-vyncke-2017-10-23-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-acme-acme
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 18)
Type Telechat Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2017-10-24
Requested 2017-09-27
Authors Richard Barnes , Jacob Hoffman-Andrews , Daniel McCarney , James Kasten
I-D last updated 2017-10-23
Completed reviews Genart Telechat review of -07 by Dale R. Worley (diff)
Opsdir Telechat review of -07 by Éric Vyncke (diff)
Tsvart Telechat review of -08 by Martin Stiemerling (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -11 by Dale R. Worley (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -12 by Dale R. Worley (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -12 by Scott G. Kelly (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -13 by Dale R. Worley (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Éric Vyncke
State Completed
Request Telechat review on draft-ietf-acme-acme by Ops Directorate Assigned
Reviewed revision 07 (document currently at 18)
Result Has issues
Completed 2017-10-23
review-ietf-acme-acme-07-opsdir-telechat-vyncke-2017-10-23-00
I reviewed the document " Automatic Certificate Management Environment (ACME)"
(draft-ietf-acme-acme-07) as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.

These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the operational area
directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

ACME is a client/server protocol used to obtain certificate via a web domain
validation.

The protocol includes error message/signaling with well-defined errors which is
good. It also includes a way to check the status of any certificate signing
request which is also good for operations. Key roll-over are also specified.

The section 11 is about 'operational considerations' and its content is also
useful.

I am puzzled by the lack of version in the protocol itself. There is just a
User-Agent string with 'the name and version of the ACME software' of the
client but it is not about the version of the protocol.

Beside this lack of version, ACME appears like a well-thought protocol taken
into consideration operations.

-éric