Telechat Review of draft-ietf-acme-acme-12
review-ietf-acme-acme-12-secdir-telechat-kelly-2018-07-05-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-acme-acme |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 18) | |
Type | Telechat Review | |
Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
Deadline | 2017-10-24 | |
Requested | 2017-09-27 | |
Authors | Richard Barnes , Jacob Hoffman-Andrews , Daniel McCarney , James Kasten | |
I-D last updated | 2018-07-05 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Telechat review of -07
by Dale R. Worley
(diff)
Opsdir Telechat review of -07 by Éric Vyncke (diff) Tsvart Telechat review of -08 by Martin Stiemerling (diff) Genart Last Call review of -11 by Dale R. Worley (diff) Genart Telechat review of -12 by Dale R. Worley (diff) Secdir Telechat review of -12 by Scott G. Kelly (diff) Genart Last Call review of -13 by Dale R. Worley (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Scott G. Kelly |
State | Completed | |
Request | Telechat review on draft-ietf-acme-acme by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 12 (document currently at 18) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2018-07-05 |
review-ietf-acme-acme-12-secdir-telechat-kelly-2018-07-05-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. The summary of the review is ready. This document describes an online certificate enrollment protocol that automates the certificate issuance and verification process. The document currently focuses on the web server use case where the identifier is a domain name. The security considerations section is well-written and detailed. I don't see any issues with this document.