Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ancp-pon-
review-ietf-ancp-pon-genart-lc-even-2012-04-05-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-ancp-pon
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 05)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2012-04-05
Requested 2012-03-22
Authors Dr. Nabil N. Bitar , Sanjay Wadhwa , Thomas Haag , Li Hongyu
I-D last updated 2012-04-05
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -?? by Roni Even
Genart Last Call review of -04 by Roni Even (diff)
Tsvdir Early review of -?? by Allison Mankin
Assignment Reviewer Roni Even
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-ancp-pon by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Completed 2012-04-05
review-ietf-ancp-pon-genart-lc-even-2012-04-05-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART,
please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Sorry for the late review due to IET meeting.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may
receive.



Document:

draft-ietf-ancp-pon-02

Reviewer: Roni Even

Review Date:2012–4–1

IETF LC End Date: 2012–3–30

IESG Telechat date:



Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational

RFC

.



Major issues:



Minor issues:



Nits/editorial comments:



In section 4 ”

However, the broadcast capability on the PON enables the AN (OLT) to send one
copy on the PON as opposed to N  copies of a multicast channel on the PON
serving N premises being  receivers” I think the “being” before the last word
should be deleted



General editorial comment is about page breaks which can be better like section
7 title is at the end of a page and the text is in the next page. Also some of
the figures and their descriptions are split between pages.