Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signaling-10
review-ietf-ccamp-wson-signaling-10-opsdir-lc-wicinski-2015-03-21-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signaling |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 12) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
Deadline | 2015-03-18 | |
Requested | 2015-03-11 | |
Authors | Greg M. Bernstein , Sugang Xu , Young Lee , Giovanni Martinelli , Hiroaki Harai | |
I-D last updated | 2015-03-21 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -09
by Francis Dupont
(diff)
Genart Telechat review of -12 by Francis Dupont Secdir Last Call review of -09 by Benjamin Kaduk (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -10 by Tim Wicinski (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Tim Wicinski |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signaling by Ops Directorate Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 10 (document currently at 12) | |
Result | Has nits | |
Completed | 2015-03-21 |
review-ietf-ccamp-wson-signaling-10-opsdir-lc-wicinski-2015-03-21-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG review. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. Revision reviewed: draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signaling-10 Summary: Ready with nits and notes. ID Nits: Has Nits Note: There is IPR. Intended status: Standards Track I've read the document and I think it is ready for proceeding. I have some minor editorial comments which I will pass along to the authors. Nits: -- The draft header indicates that this document updates RFC6205, but the abstract doesn't seem to mention this, which it should. == Outdated reference: draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-info has been published as RFC 7446 Reference Comment: Under Informative References RFC6163 is listed as "work in progress: draft-bernstein-ccamp-wavelength-switched-03.txt, February 2008" It's t he only RFC reference that looks off.