Telechat Review of draft-ietf-core-sid-21
review-ietf-core-sid-21-intdir-telechat-haberman-2023-10-13-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-core-sid |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 24) | |
| Type | Telechat Review | |
| Team | Internet Area Directorate (intdir) | |
| Deadline | 2023-10-15 | |
| Requested | 2023-10-04 | |
| Requested by | Éric Vyncke | |
| Authors | Michel Veillette , Alexander Pelov , Ivaylo Petrov , Carsten Bormann , Michael Richardson | |
| I-D last updated | 2023-10-13 | |
| Completed reviews |
Dnsdir Last Call review of -21
by R. (Miek) Gieben
(diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -21 by Brian Haberman (diff) Iotdir Telechat review of -21 by Stephen Farrell (diff) Yangdoctors Last Call review of -15 by Xufeng Liu (diff) Genart Last Call review of -15 by Linda Dunbar (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Brian Haberman |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Telechat review on draft-ietf-core-sid by Internet Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/3ONXbx9exDDNmbHMMh3ToZnfoBo | |
| Reviewed revision | 21 (document currently at 24) | |
| Result | Ready w/issues | |
| Completed | 2023-10-13 |
review-ietf-core-sid-21-intdir-telechat-haberman-2023-10-13-00
I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-core-sid. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more details on the INT Directorate, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/. Major Issues: Minor Issues: 1. I am a little concerned about interoperability given the existing use of YANG modules without identifiers. I would have liked to have seen a section in the document that explicitly talks about interoperability and any guidance that may help with such challenges. Nits: 1. I agree with Stephen's comment that "identifiers" is a bit nebulous and would benefit from some clarifying text. 2. I agree with Linda's comment about the unfortunate use of the SID acronym.