Telechat Review of draft-ietf-core-sid-21
review-ietf-core-sid-21-iotdir-telechat-farrell-2023-10-06-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-core-sid
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 24)
Type Telechat Review
Team Internet of Things Directorate (iotdir)
Deadline 2023-10-15
Requested 2023-10-04
Requested by Éric Vyncke
Authors Michel Veillette , Alexander Pelov , Ivaylo Petrov , Carsten Bormann , Michael Richardson
I-D last updated 2023-10-06
Completed reviews Dnsdir Last Call review of -21 by R. (Miek) Gieben (diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -21 by Brian Haberman (diff)
Iotdir Telechat review of -21 by Stephen Farrell (diff)
Yangdoctors Last Call review of -15 by Xufeng Liu (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -15 by Linda Dunbar (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Stephen Farrell
State Completed
Request Telechat review on draft-ietf-core-sid by Internet of Things Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iot-directorate/TaDIXSlpq4WWOiJEgSvCk7A2ndU
Reviewed revision 21 (document currently at 24)
Result Ready
Completed 2023-10-06
review-ietf-core-sid-21-iotdir-telechat-farrell-2023-10-06-00
I'm not a yang expert. The document is clear. I'm not sure how the dynamics of
these allocations will play out over time, but it seems entirely reasonable to
try this as planned.

One nit, the draft says:

   The following items are identified using SIDs:
   *  identities

That seems wrong, you're not intending that a 63-bit number be allocated for
user@example.com so I think what you mean is that SIDs can identify types of
identity/identifiers rather than the values of those. If the latter were the
intent, then I'd have significant privacy concerns and this review would have
reached a "not ready" conclusion.