Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-detnet-bounded-latency-08

Request Review of draft-ietf-detnet-bounded-latency
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 10)
Type Last Call Review
Team ART Area Review Team (artart)
Deadline 2022-02-08
Requested 2022-01-25
Authors Norman Finn , Jean-Yves Le Boudec , Ehsan Mohammadpour , Jiayi Zhang , Balazs Varga
I-D last updated 2022-02-06
Completed reviews Rtgdir Last Call review of -06 by Tony Przygienda (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -08 by Gyan Mishra (diff)
Intdir Last Call review of -08 by Ralf Weber (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -08 by Watson Ladd (diff)
Artart Last Call review of -08 by Robert Sparks (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -08 by Yoshifumi Nishida (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -10 by Watson Ladd
Assignment Reviewer Robert Sparks
State Completed Snapshot
Review review-ietf-detnet-bounded-latency-08-artart-lc-sparks-2022-02-06
Posted at
Reviewed revision 08 (document currently at 10)
Result Ready w/issues
Completed 2022-02-06
This is an artart Last Call review of draft-ietf-detndet-bounded-latency-08

This document is Mostly Ready for publication as an Informational RFC, but
there are some issues to consider before publication.

It's not clear to me who this document is intended to inform. While reasonably
written, it feels more like part of a larger discussion without pointers to
that discussion, and I'm not seeing the utility of publishing it in the RFC
series as it is currently framed. I don't _object_ to it's publication, but
please consider if the purpose and audience could be made more clear.

I find the division of Normative/Informative references suspect. In particular,
please reconsider whether the IEEE references, particularly IEEE802.1Q-2018
should be normative.

The document uses AVB as an acronym for (I think) A vs B, but that
three-letter-acronym is already well used in this space (even in other detnet
documents) to mean Audio Video Bridge. Is this collision necessary?

At section 7, "application of this document" is unclear. Consider expanding
what you mean to say. I think you mean something like "an example use of the
models in this document to inform the admission of a detnet flow"?

I support Ralf Weber's comments.