Last Call Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-07
review-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-07-artart-lc-jennings-2021-08-09-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 08)
Type Last Call Review
Team ART Area Review Team (artart)
Deadline 2021-08-19
Requested 2021-08-05
Authors Benjamin Schwartz, Mike Bishop, Erik Nygren
Draft last updated 2021-08-09
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -07 by Dale Worley (diff)
Artart Last Call review of -07 by Cullen Jennings (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -07 by Joe Clarke (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -07 by Kyle Rose (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Cullen Jennings 
State Completed
Review review-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-07-artart-lc-jennings-2021-08-09
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/CfAGYlDfw5kPjlhbujmikX43J6Q
Reviewed rev. 07 (document currently at 08)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2021-08-09

Review
review-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-07-artart-lc-jennings-2021-08-09

This draft looks good and ready for publications. 

The draft could benefit from more discussion on the maximum sizes of records and what happens when they are exceeded. 

There seems to be some opinionated "you must eat your vegetables stuff" in the draft that will just be ignored by people using this draft. For example, I understand how OSCP stapling speeds things up but I can not see a single reason why the mechanism in this draft need the deployment of OSCP stapling.