Last Call Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-07
review-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-07-artart-lc-jennings-2021-08-09-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 11)
Type Last Call Review
Team ART Area Review Team (artart)
Deadline 2021-08-19
Requested 2021-08-05
Authors Benjamin M. Schwartz , Mike Bishop , Erik Nygren
Draft last updated 2021-08-09
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -07 by Dale R. Worley (diff)
Artart Last Call review of -07 by Cullen Fluffy Jennings (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -07 by Joe Clarke (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -07 by Kyle Rose (diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -08 by Carlos Pignataro (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Cullen Fluffy Jennings
State Completed Snapshot
Review review-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-07-artart-lc-jennings-2021-08-09
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/CfAGYlDfw5kPjlhbujmikX43J6Q
Reviewed revision 07 (document currently at 11)
Result Ready
Completed 2021-08-09
review-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-07-artart-lc-jennings-2021-08-09-00
This draft looks good and ready for publications.

The draft could benefit from more discussion on the maximum sizes of records
and what happens when they are exceeded.

There seems to be some opinionated "you must eat your vegetables stuff" in the
draft that will just be ignored by people using this draft. For example, I
understand how OSCP stapling speeds things up but I can not see a single reason
why the mechanism in this draft need the deployment of OSCP stapling.