Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-04
review-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-04-rtgdir-lc-white-2017-04-10-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 08)
Type Last Call Review
Team Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir)
Deadline 2017-04-18
Requested 2017-04-07
Requested by Alvaro Retana
Authors Jared Mauch , Job Snijders , Greg Hankins
I-D last updated 2017-04-10
Completed reviews Opsdir Last Call review of -04 by Carlos M. Martínez (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -05 by Takeshi Takahashi (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -04 by Dale R. Worley (diff)
Rtgdir Last Call review of -04 by Russ White (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -08 by Takeshi Takahashi
Genart Telechat review of -07 by Dale R. Worley (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -08 by Dale R. Worley
Comments
If needed, we can extend the review period until the Telechat date (the document is not scheduled yet).
Assignment Reviewer Russ White
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject by Routing Area Directorate Assigned
Reviewed revision 04 (document currently at 08)
Result Ready
Completed 2017-04-10
review-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-04-rtgdir-lc-white-2017-04-10-00
Hello,

I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The
Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as
they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special
request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs.
For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see
​http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir

Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would
be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call
comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by
updating the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-04
Reviewer: Russ White
Review Date: 10 April 2017
Intended Status: Standards Track

Summary:

No issues found. This document is ready for publication.

Comments:

The draft is mercifully short and very readable, clearly noting the
requirements on implementations and their consequences.

Major Issues:

No major issues found.

Minor Issues:

No minor issues found.

:-) /r