Last Call Review of draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-04
review-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-04-rtgdir-lc-white-2017-04-10-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 08) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir) | |
Deadline | 2017-04-18 | |
Requested | 2017-04-07 | |
Requested by | Alvaro Retana | |
Authors | Jared Mauch , Job Snijders , Greg Hankins | |
I-D last updated | 2017-04-10 | |
Completed reviews |
Opsdir Last Call review of -04
by Carlos M. Martínez
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -05 by Takeshi Takahashi (diff) Genart Last Call review of -04 by Dale R. Worley (diff) Rtgdir Last Call review of -04 by Russ White (diff) Secdir Telechat review of -08 by Takeshi Takahashi Genart Telechat review of -07 by Dale R. Worley (diff) Genart Telechat review of -08 by Dale R. Worley |
|
Comments |
If needed, we can extend the review period until the Telechat date (the document is not scheduled yet). |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Russ White |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject by Routing Area Directorate Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 04 (document currently at 08) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2017-04-10 |
review-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-04-rtgdir-lc-white-2017-04-10-00
Hello, I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by updating the draft. Document: draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-04 Reviewer: Russ White Review Date: 10 April 2017 Intended Status: Standards Track Summary: No issues found. This document is ready for publication. Comments: The draft is mercifully short and very readable, clearly noting the requirements on implementations and their consequences. Major Issues: No major issues found. Minor Issues: No minor issues found. :-) /r