Telechat Review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-19
review-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-19-tsvart-telechat-trammell-2018-09-25-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 38) | |
Type | Telechat Review | |
Team | Transport Area Review Team (tsvart) | |
Deadline | 2018-09-25 | |
Requested | 2018-09-11 | |
Authors | Dino Farinacci , Vince Fuller , David Meyer , Darrel Lewis , Albert Cabellos-Aparicio | |
I-D last updated | 2018-09-25 | |
Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Last Call review of -14
by John Drake
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -15 by Kyle Rose (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -16 by Scott O. Bradner (diff) Tsvart Last Call review of -15 by Brian Trammell (diff) Genart Telechat review of -16 by Francis Dupont (diff) Tsvart Telechat review of -19 by Brian Trammell (diff) Secdir Telechat review of -18 by Kyle Rose (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Brian Trammell |
State | Completed | |
Request | Telechat review on draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis by Transport Area Review Team Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 19 (document currently at 38) | |
Result | Ready w/nits | |
Completed | 2018-09-25 |
review-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-19-tsvart-telechat-trammell-2018-09-25-00
Thanks for the revisions. Following up on my previous tsvart review, there is one remaining nit from previous transport reviews: - Section 5.3, the list "When doing ITR/PITR encapsulation", third item needs a citation fix: OLD: The 'Explicit Congestion Notification' (ECN) field (bits 6 and 7 of the IPv6 'Traffic Class' field) requires special treatment in order to avoid discarding indications of congestion [RFC3168]. NEW: The 'Explicit Congestion Notification' (ECN) field (bits 6 and 7 of the IPv6 'Traffic Class' field) requires special treatment in order to avoid discarding indications of congestion [RFC6040]. Thanks, cheers, Brian