Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-mpls-p2mp-bfd-08
review-ietf-mpls-p2mp-bfd-08-rtgdir-lc-dukes-2024-12-16-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-mpls-p2mp-bfd
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 09)
Type Last Call Review
Team Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir)
Deadline 2024-12-17
Requested 2024-11-26
Requested by Jim Guichard
Authors Greg Mirsky , Gyan Mishra , Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
I-D last updated 2024-12-16
Completed reviews Rtgdir Last Call review of -06 by Joel M. Halpern (diff)
Rtgdir Last Call review of -08 by Darren Dukes (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -08 by Meral Shirazipour (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -08 by Chris M. Lonvick (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -08 by Bo Wu (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Darren Dukes
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-mpls-p2mp-bfd by Routing Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/9dmr2i_tNrvapOW013oh6DChWAE
Reviewed revision 08 (document currently at 09)
Result Ready
Completed 2024-12-16
review-ietf-mpls-p2mp-bfd-08-rtgdir-lc-dukes-2024-12-16-00
Hello,

I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The
Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as
they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special
request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs.
For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see
https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/rtg/RtgDir

Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would
be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call
comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by
updating the draft.

Document:  draft-ietf-mpls-p2mp-bfd
Reviewer:  Darren Dukes
Review Date: December 16 2024
IETF LC End Date: 
Intended Status: Standards Track

Summary:  This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard.

Comments:
    The document is clear, readable and complete, 
    and does exactly what its abstract claims:
    describes BFD for MPLS Multipoint Networks, updates RFC8562, 
    bootstrapping sessions and active tails.
    I believe it is ready for IESG approval.

Major Issues: None

Minor Issues: None

Notes:
The reference to DetNet was unexpected in section 5 
but I believe the discussion on congestion it's mentioned in is complete.

IANA and IETF instructions are clear, there are ample values
available in the registry in question.