Last Call Review of draft-ietf-netconf-netconf-client-server-37
review-ietf-netconf-netconf-client-server-37-genart-lc-robles-2024-09-13-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-netconf-netconf-client-server |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 38) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2024-09-13 | |
Requested | 2024-08-30 | |
Authors | Kent Watsen | |
I-D last updated | 2024-09-13 | |
Completed reviews |
Yangdoctors Last Call review of -04
by Andy Bierman
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -37 by Daniel Migault (diff) Yangdoctors Last Call review of -37 by Andy Bierman (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -37 by Tim Chown (diff) Tsvart Last Call review of -37 by Lars Eggert (diff) Genart Last Call review of -37 by Ines Robles (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Ines Robles |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-netconf-netconf-client-server by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/Cmaty5hWJ9PvvLRiButG3GxopXY | |
Reviewed revision | 37 (document currently at 38) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2024-09-13 |
review-ietf-netconf-netconf-client-server-37-genart-lc-robles-2024-09-13-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>. Document: draft-ietf-netconf-netconf-client-server-37 Reviewer: Ines Robles Review Date: 2024-09-13 IETF LC End Date: 2024-09-13 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: This document introduces two YANG modules: one for configuring a NETCONF client and the other for configuring a NETCONF server. Both modules provide support for the SSH and TLS transport protocols, as well as standard NETCONF and NETCONF Call Home connections. The document is well-written and clear. Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits/editorial comments: None Thanks for this document, Ines.