Last Call Review of draft-ietf-netconf-netconf-client-server-37
review-ietf-netconf-netconf-client-server-37-opsdir-lc-chown-2024-10-03-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-netconf-netconf-client-server-37 |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | 37 (document currently at 38) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
Deadline | 2024-08-30 | |
Requested | 2024-08-15 | |
Requested by | Mahesh Jethanandani | |
Authors | Kent Watsen | |
I-D last updated | 2024-10-03 | |
Completed reviews |
Yangdoctors Last Call review of -04
by Andy Bierman
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -37 by Daniel Migault (diff) Yangdoctors Last Call review of -37 by Andy Bierman (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -37 by Tim Chown (diff) Tsvart Last Call review of -37 by Lars Eggert (diff) Genart Last Call review of -37 by Ines Robles (diff) |
|
Comments |
This document was meant to be a part of a cluster of 9 documents, 7 of which form the "stack" of groupings used by this draft. Those "stack" groupings roughly map to the different layers of the OSI 7 layer stack, with this draft coming in at the application layer. References to those documents can be found in the document. |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Tim Chown |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-netconf-netconf-client-server by Ops Directorate Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ops-dir/OugTzl4zg20QMjwUu5AGJee002o | |
Reviewed revision | 37 (document currently at 38) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2024-10-03 |
review-ietf-netconf-netconf-client-server-37-opsdir-lc-chown-2024-10-03-00
Hi, I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG review. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. The draft defines two YANG modules, one module to configure a NETCONF client and the other module to configure a NETCONF server, where both modules support both the SSH and TLS transport protocols. Status: Ready for publication I am not a YANG expert, and thus trust the positive review of the "YANG doctor" on that aspect, but the rest of the document, and its purpose, seems both good and useful. It appears to be ready for publication. Best wishes, Tim