Last Call Review of draft-ietf-nmop-terminology-10
review-ietf-nmop-terminology-10-genart-lc-kyzivat-2025-02-01-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-nmop-terminology |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 13) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2025-02-13 | |
| Requested | 2025-01-30 | |
| Requested by | Mohamed Boucadair | |
| Authors | Nigel Davis , Adrian Farrel , Thomas Graf , Qin Wu , Chaode Yu | |
| I-D last updated | 2025-02-01 | |
| Completed reviews |
Secdir Early review of -07
by Hilarie Orman
(diff)
Genart Early review of -07 by Paul Kyzivat (diff) Opsdir Early review of -07 by Jouni Korhonen (diff) Rtgdir Early review of -07 by Stewart Bryant (diff) Iotdir Early review of -07 by Carsten Bormann (diff) Intdir Early review of -07 by Dirk Von Hugo (diff) Iotdir Last Call review of -12 by Carsten Bormann (diff) Genart Last Call review of -10 by Paul Kyzivat (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -10 by Hilarie Orman (diff) |
|
| Comments |
You kindly reviewed an early version of the document. Your review was very useful and triggered changes that were implemented by the authors. Now that the document is in the WGLC, we would like to double check that your issues were adequately handled. Of course, we welcome new comments and issues that you might have. Thank you |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Paul Kyzivat |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-nmop-terminology by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/eP2zuWKKropP0up_0Q5gT57bnL0 | |
| Reviewed revision | 10 (document currently at 13) | |
| Result | Ready w/nits | |
| Completed | 2025-02-01 |
review-ietf-nmop-terminology-10-genart-lc-kyzivat-2025-02-01-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-nmop-terminology-07 Reviewer: Paul Kyzivat Review Date: 2025-02-01 IETF LC End Date: TBD IESG Telechat date: TBD Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should be fixed before publication. The changes since -07 have resolved all of my concerns on that version. I find the document much clearer. ISSUES: 0 NITS: 1 1) NIT: Inconsistency In Figure 3, a Fault gives rise to an Alert, that gives rise to an Alarm. In Figure 4, a Problem directly gives rise to an Alarm, with no intermediary Alert. Is this inconsistency intended? If so, it could be helpful to explain it.