Skip to main content

IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-raw-architecture-25
review-ietf-raw-architecture-25-genart-lc-sarikaya-2025-06-24-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-raw-architecture
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 27)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2025-06-24
Requested 2025-06-10
Authors Pascal Thubert
I-D last updated 2025-07-10 (Latest revision 2025-07-07)
Completed reviews Rtgdir Early review of -21 by Acee Lindem (diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -25 by Behcet Sarikaya (diff)
Tsvart IETF Last Call review of -25 by Wesley Eddy (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -25 by Rich Salz (diff)
Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -25 by Giuseppe Fioccola (diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -25 by Brian Haberman (diff)
Iotdir Telechat review of -25 by Dave Thaler (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Behcet Sarikaya
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-raw-architecture by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/FdKvGDZE2HoN1hF4m8N0xakptio
Reviewed revision 25 (document currently at 27)
Result Ready w/issues
Completed 2025-06-24
review-ietf-raw-architecture-25-genart-lc-sarikaya-2025-06-24-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>.

Document: draft-ietf-raw-architecture-25
Reviewer: Behcet Sarikaya
Review Date: 2025-06-24
IETF LC End Date: 2025-06-24
IESG Telechat date: 2025-07-10

Summary:

This draft reliable and available wireless architecture in the context of
deterministic networking or DetNet, i.e. the draft

complements DetNet for wireless.

Overall, it is a good document, involving huge amount of work, especially I
liked Section 3.1.1.1 3rd and 4th paragraphs explaining wireless single point
of failure.

However it has a number of typos and issues.

Major issues:N/A

Minor issues:

It seems like on DetNet there is currently ongoing research and development
involving TSN in IEEE 802.1 and IETF. I suggest that the document makes it
clear that Sections 4 and 5 describe roughly a design which needs to be
implemented together with TSN as part of link layer.

Nits/editorial comments:

Issues:
Many typos:
Sec. 2 controled -> controlled
2.1.6 massage & 2.1.6 massaged -> message
3.2 recieve -> receive
The assumption us -> is
Along a alternative paths -> along alternative paths
5.1 fucntion -> function

Please check, possibly reword:
3.1.1.1 2nd par.

Through the games of encapsulation

3.2 OODA list Point 2
may also generate knowledge and wisdom such as a trained model for link quality
prediction

On Fig. 6 is there or not tunneling on strict RAW over Detnet?

5.1
SD-WAN
MPLS-TP undefined