Early Review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-bfd-p2p-03
review-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-bfd-p2p-03-rtgdir-early-zhang-2026-07-28-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-bfd-p2p |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 03) | |
| Type | Early Review | |
| Team | Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir) | |
| Deadline | 2026-07-24 | |
| Requested | 2026-06-19 | |
| Requested by | Yingzhen Qu | |
| Authors | Nitish Gupta , Aditya Dogra , Colin Docherty , Jeff Tantsura | |
| I-D last updated | 2026-02-27 (Latest revision 2026-02-27) | |
| Completed reviews |
Opsdir Early review of -03
by Michael P
Rtgdir Early review of -03 by Zhaohui (Jeffrey) Zhang Secdir Early review of -03 by Paul Wouters |
|
| Comments |
Preparation for WGLC. |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Zhaohui (Jeffrey) Zhang |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Early review on draft-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-bfd-p2p by Routing Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/v8OECf0GzaHt5Fez9Xu1rsEQ2GQ | |
| Reviewed revision | 03 | |
| Result | Has nits | |
| Completed | 2026-07-28 |
review-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-bfd-p2p-03-rtgdir-early-zhang-2026-07-28-00
I have two questions/comments: - For the backup advertisement, should we skip the IPvX addresses listed in the advertisement? - It seems that when the critical BFD session goes down, every backup will rush out an advertisement w/o a skew. It is even possible that a lower priority one sends out the advertisement first - depending on which session goes down first. With the backup advertisements, the one with the highest priority (or with the higher address in the case of a tie) can be pre-determined and only that one needs to send out the advertisement. Should this approach be taken?