Telechat Review of draft-ietf-softwire-map-t-06
review-ietf-softwire-map-t-06-genart-telechat-romascanu-2014-10-29-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-softwire-map-t |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 08) | |
| Type | Telechat Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2014-10-28 | |
| Requested | 2014-10-16 | |
| Authors | Xing Li , Congxiao Bao , Wojciech Dec , Ole Trøan , Satoru Matsushima , Tetsuya Murakami | |
| I-D last updated | 2020-01-21 (Latest revision 2014-12-02) | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart IETF Last Call review of -05
by Dan Romascanu
(diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -05 by Dan Romascanu (diff) Genart Telechat review of -06 by Dan Romascanu (diff) Genart IETF Last Call review of -08 by Dan Romascanu Secdir IETF Last Call review of -05 by Taylor Yu (diff) Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -05 by Victor Kuarsingh (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Dan Romascanu |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Telechat review on draft-ietf-softwire-map-t by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 06 (document currently at 08) | |
| Result | Ready w/issues | |
| Completed | 2014-10-29 |
review-ietf-softwire-map-t-06-genart-telechat-romascanu-2014-10-29-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-softwire-map-t-06.txt Reviewer: Dan Romascanu Review Date: 10/28/2014 IETF LC End Date: 10/10/2014 IESG Telechat date: 10/30/2014 Summary: Ready with issues. One issue from my initial review was not clarified IMO. The status of this document is Experimental. It is not clear why. There are no experimental documents in the softwire WG charter, and the status of the ‘sister’ document draft-ietf-softwire-map is Standards Track. Why the difference? The discussion around that issue shows that the editors seem to be in disagreement with the chairs about the status of the document. See mail http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/current/msg10713.html . I suggest that the IESG discussed this issue before approving the document.