Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-trill-p2mp-bfd-07
review-ietf-trill-p2mp-bfd-07-opsdir-lc-bhandari-2018-01-10-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-trill-p2mp-bfd
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 09)
Type Last Call Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2018-01-08
Requested 2017-12-18
Authors Mingui Zhang , Santosh Pallagatti , Vengada Prasad Govindan
I-D last updated 2018-01-10
Completed reviews Rtgdir Early review of -04 by Carlos Pignataro (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -07 by Shwetha Bhandari (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -06 by Meral Shirazipour (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -07 by Stephen Farrell (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -08 by Meral Shirazipour (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Shwetha Bhandari
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-trill-p2mp-bfd by Ops Directorate Assigned
Reviewed revision 07 (document currently at 09)
Result Has nits
Completed 2018-01-10
review-ietf-trill-p2mp-bfd-07-opsdir-lc-bhandari-2018-01-10-00
Reviewer: Shwetha Bhandari
Review Result: Ready with one nit

I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of
the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included
in AD reviews during the IESG review.  Document editors and WG chairs should
treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

Summary:
This document specifies the support of P2MP BFD in TRILL.
This document extends RFC 7175 TRILL BFD Support to P2MP BFD being defined by
draft-ietf-bfd-multipoint. There is no operational considerations or
manageability section in the document. I don’t see any operational, network
management concerns with this document. For security consideration the concern
raised here
[https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trill/VcoPfBXqDG3K5cuydXqQ7juv9Rg] there
is new proposed text that needs wg review. The new text proposed to use TRILL
RFC 7978 authentication instead of current recommendation of BFD multipoint
authentication.

Nit:
Section 6 – In : See [I-D.ietf-bfd-multipoint-active-tail] for detail
operations of tacking active tails. s/tacking/tracking

Thanks,
Shwetha