Last Call Review of draft-yee-ssh-iana-requirements-01
review-yee-ssh-iana-requirements-01-genart-lc-bryant-2022-10-22-00
| Request | Review of | draft-yee-ssh-iana-requirements |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 03) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2022-10-28 | |
| Requested | 2022-09-30 | |
| Authors | Peter E. Yee | |
| I-D last updated | 2022-10-22 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -01
by Stewart Bryant
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -01 by Stefan Santesson (diff) Dnsdir Last Call review of -01 by Scott Rose (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Stewart Bryant |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-yee-ssh-iana-requirements by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/SU3rz0lOtN3W0SODGfX_wc7476s | |
| Reviewed revision | 01 (document currently at 03) | |
| Result | Ready w/issues | |
| Completed | 2022-10-22 |
review-yee-ssh-iana-requirements-01-genart-lc-bryant-2022-10-22-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-yee-ssh-iana-requirements-01 Reviewer: Stewart Bryant Review Date: 2022-10-22 IETF LC End Date: 2022-10-28 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: Generally a well written document that is ready to go. However, I have a concern about whether SHOULD is strong enough in terms of explaining the reason to deny an allocation request. Then a question of IETF policy on use if RFC 2119 language and a possible typo. All of this is easily addressed. Major issues: Denials SHOULD include an explanation and, if SB> For transparency and due diligence surely denials MUST include an explanation? Minor issues: SB> I am not sure that RFC2119 language is applicable to the human action it is applied to in this text. Nits/editorial comments: 3. Designated Expert Pool Expert Review [RFC8126] registry requests are registered after a three-week review period on the <ssh-reg-review@ietf.org> mailing list, on the advice of one or more designated experts. However, to SB> list, and on…?