Minutes interim-2024-iab-02: Wed 15:00
minutes-interim-2024-iab-02-202401241500-00
Meeting Minutes | Internet Architecture Board (iab) IETF | |
---|---|---|
Date and time | 2024-01-24 15:00 | |
Title | Minutes interim-2024-iab-02: Wed 15:00 | |
State | Active | |
Other versions | plain text | |
Last updated | 2024-02-07 |
minutes-interim-2024-iab-02-202401241500-00
Minutes of the 2024-01-24 IAB Business Meeting 1. Administrivia 1.1. Attendance Present: Matthew Bocci (incoming IAB) Roman Danyliw (IESG Liaison) Dhruv Dhody Lars Eggert (IETF Chair) Liz Flynn (IETF Secretariat) Wes Hardaker Cullen Jennings Mallory Knodel Suresh Krishnan Mirja Kühlewind (IAB Chair) Cindy Morgan (IAB Executive Administrative Manager) Tommy Pauly Colin Perkins (IRTF Chair) David Schinazi Sabrina Tanamal (IANA Liaison) Sally Wentworth (ISOC Liaison) Christopher Wood Greg Wood (IETF Director of Communications and Operations) Qin Wu Jiankang Yao Regrets: Alissa Cooper (incoming IAB) Alvaro Retana Guests: Alexey Melnikov (CFRG Chair) Stanislav Smyshlyaev (CFRG Chair) Paul Wouters (SEC AD) Observers: None 1.2. Agenda bash and announcements Cindy Morgan reported that the iab.org website transfer is almost complete and will be given to the Tools Team for implementation next week. 1.3. Meeting Minutes The following meeting minutes were approved: • 2024-01-10 business meeting - (draft submitted 2024-01-10) 1.4. Action Item Review Done: • 2023-08-23: Suresh Krishnan to draft a blog post about the E-Impact Program. • 2024-01-10: Cindy Morgan to send email about redirecting the public IAB Mediawiki to Wikijs. - Currently waiting for Tools Team to implement redirects. On Hold: • 2023-05-11: Suresh Krishnan et al to write a draft on limited domains. (Check back end of June 2023) • 2023-06-07: Dhruv Dhody and Mallory Knodel to track adding IAB review of proposed WG charters to the Datatracker. See https://github.com/ietf-tools/datatracker/issues/5849 In Progress: • 2022-07-24: Mallory Knodel and Mirja Kühlewind to draft a document outlining the architectural principles that the IAB thinks are important and need to be understood when considering Internet governance. • 2023-05-11: Dhruv Dhody to look at the last ~10 years of IAB Workshops and see if there were any concrete outputs. • 2023-08-23: Suresh Krishnan to draft a blog post about the E- Impact Program. • 2023-11-07: Chris Wood, Tommy Pauly, and Wes Hardaker to work with Hannes Tschofenig on a response to the Confidential Computing Consortium's liaison statement in response to the IAB Statement on Attestation. • 2023-11-09: Mirja Kühlewind to reach out to legal regarding design teams and contributions. New: • 2024-01-24: Tommy Pauly/David Schinazi to follow up with the people who submitted comments on draft-iab-privacy-partitioning. • 2024-01-24: Cindy Morgan to send an approval announcement for draft-iab-privacy-partitioning once the authors confirm it is ready to go. • 2024-01-24: Mallory Knodel to start a thread to set up a technical discussion about upcoming UN consultations that affect IETF technologies. • 2024-01-24: Cindy Morgan to send an e-vote on the ICANN Technical Liaison Group appointment. 1.5. IAB Document Status Update Datatracker: https://datatracker.ietf.org/stream/iab/ • draft-iab-privacy-partitioning-05 Community Review ended 2023-11-03 IAB Shepherd: David Schinazi • draft-iab-ws-environmental-impacts-report-03 Sent to the RFC Editor: EDIT IAB Shepherd: Wes Hardaker • A Vision Statement for the Internet (Mallory, Mirja) 1.6. WG Chartering in Progress (Initial Charters Only) Datatracker: https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/chartering/ • Detecting Unwanted Location Trackers (dult) Area: SEC Draft Charter IESG Telechat: (None) IAB Reviewer: Not assigned • Multiformats (multi) Area: ART Internal Review IESG Telechat: (None) IAB Reviewer: Qin Wu • Network Management Operations (nmop) Area: OPS External Review IESG Telechat: (None) IAB Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan 2. Monthly Reports (Liaisons) 2.1 IANA Liaison Report --Begin IANA Liaison Report, Sabrina Tanamal -- IANA Services Liaison Report – 24 January 2024 SLA Deliverables Update: ICANN met 100% of processing goal times for the December 2023 monthly statistics report, exceeding the SLA goal to meet 90% of processing goal times. These times include the steps that ICANN has control over and not time it is waiting on requesters, document authors or other experts. Monthly reports can be found at: https://www.iana.org/performance/ietf-statistics --End IANA Liaison Report, Sabrina Tanamal– 2.2 IRTF Report --Begin IRTF Chair Report, Colin Perkins-- IRTF Chair report to the IAB for the month ending 2024-01-23 Research Groups Chris Wood stepped down as PEARG co-chair; after discussion with remaining chairs, no immediate plans to appoint a replacement. HRPC rechartering ongoing. ANRP Reviews completed and six awards announced from 59 nominations. Scheduling of award talks in progress. ANRW Ongoing discussion with ACM around budget and process. Planning for ANRW 2024 is underway and call for papers should be published shortly. Documents and Errata In RG Last Call: draft-irtf-nmrg-ai-challenges draft-irtf-coinrg-use-cases draft-irtf-nmrg-green-ps draft-irtf-cfrg-dnhpke Waiting for IRTF Chair: draft-irtf-hrpc-association Revised I-D Needed In IESG Review: draft-irtf-hrpc-guidelines Sent to the RFC Editor: draft-irtf-icnrg-icnping draft-irtf-icnrg-ccnx-timetlv draft-irtf-icnrg-pathsteering draft-irtf-t2trg-iot-edge draft-irtf-qirg-quantum-internet-use-cases draft-irtf-cfrg-frost draft-irtf-icnrg-icntraceroute Other Activities Diversity travel grants for Brisbane allocated. Ongoing work on IRTF code of conduct, proposed policy on fee waivers, and policy on updating records. --End IRTF Chair Report, Colin Perkins-- 2.3 ICANN Liaison Report --Begin ICANN Liaison Report, Harald Alvestrand -- IETF Liaison report on ICANN, January 2024 This is the status of ICANN as seen from the IETF liaison per Jan 23, 2024. New gTLDs - SubPro This is about new top level domains - the “next round”, following up on the 2012 round that let a thousand new gTLDs bloom… The implementation phase is rolling forward. Still a long way from the release date, but prerequisites are getting addressed. Two important developments are the outcome on closed generics - the work between GAC, GNSO and others to come up with an agreement on how to define rules for registering new TLDs that are both reserved for a single entity and constitue a generic term ended in failure - the recommendation from the GAC, which the board is still evaluating, is that this results in the 2012 round rule being unchanged - there will be no such TLDs registered. Everyone’s still VERY uncertain what the demand will be this time around - the “estimate used for planning” is the same size as the 2012 round (2000ish applications), but the fact is that nobody knows. Access to non-public registrant data - RDRS The ICANN-mediated mechanism for requesting access to non-public domain name registrant data opened for service in November, and the statistics for December have been published. Out of a total of a couple of thousand attempts to use the system, the vast majority resulted in either the domain being out of scope for the RDRS (such as ccTLDs or non-participant registrars), filled out wrongly (as determined by the registrar, not the RDRS), or denied for other reasons. A double-digit number resulted in data being returned, and a somewhat larger number hasn’t been answered yet. It’s hard to know what to make of this - some is testing, some is unfamilarity with the system. Very few requesters have made multiple valid requests, so not much experience is had. The numbers are still small; we should wait some more before attempting to evaluate. DNS Abuse The process of getting contracts amended for registries and registrars to take a somewhat more active role in combatting DNS abuse are now final - voted on by the registries and registrars (passing very demanding thresholds) and approved by the board this month, they are now final, and will go into effect this year. Hopefully this will bring some more clarity into what the situation is for the stuff identified as “DNS Abuse”, and form the basis of more proactive activities in the future. Administrativia: IRP panel, review processes ICANN’s accountability mechanisms (basically, decision appeals) includes the Independent Reevaluation Panel - IRP. The ATRT3 recommendations, concluded in <when?>, recommended that there be a permanent panel seated to hear this kind of appeal, instead of ad-hoc getting panelists for each case. This is now completed, and 12 permanent panelists have been selected. The topic of “how do we do reviews” is always hot in ICANN. The bylaws mandate a number of recurring reviews; experience shows that these reviews are sometimes disruptive, always a huge amount of work, and have problems getting issues addressed. The suggestion of ATRT3 was to establish a “holistic review” reviewing the whole of the organization. This requires a bylaws change to do it right, but we don’t want to do that until we know how it’s possible to make it work - so the idea of a “pilot holistic review” was floated instead. Work on starting such a review is moving forward - some community consultations have been concluded. Naturally, some misgivings were raised - in particular about the review of the structure of Supporting Organizations (SOs) and Advisory Councils (ACs) and their relationships. We’re still some way away from starting this in earnest. New ICANN CEO All I can say here is that the process is moving forward. The board has been strictly instructed to say nothing about the process except what’s in official public announcements. Conflicts of interest In several areas, board members may be caught in a conflict of interest - because they are employed by or otherwise working for organizations that have an intent to interact with the outcomes of decisions made by the board. Two such areas of concern for this liaison are the new gTLD program and the grant program - the new gTLD program because my employer, Google, is a registry and registrar under contract with ICANN, and the grant program because the parent organizations of the IAB, which appointed me, may want to apply for grants under the program. The applicaint guidebook for the grant program is being finalized; once the rules are set, it should be possible to get an assurance from IAB/IETF LLC/ISOC that I will not be put into a position of possible conflict according to the guidebook rule. In the new gTLD program, the rules are further from being finalized, but getting a similar assurance out of Google should be possible - there is precedent for that with a previous IETF liaison (Thomas Narten, who was employed by IBM). But at this moment, out of an abundance of caution, I have recused myself from participating in discussion on these two topics. --End ICANN Liaison Report, Harald Alvestrand -- 3. draft-iab-privacy-partitioning-05 The IAB approved this document pending confirmation from the authors that all comments have been addressed. 4. Open consultations with the UN Mallory Knodel reported that several consultations are coming up through various UN processes. She proposed using an upcoming tech talk slot to bring in people from the community who follow this area to suggest how the IAB can contribute with a statement of its own or in support of other statements. 5. Executive Session: Publication of national crypto in the IS stream This topic was discussed in executive session with the Security Area Directors and the Crypto Forum Research Group Chairs. 6. Executive Session: Independent Submissions Editor Appointment This topic was deferred to a future meeting. 7. Executive Session: ICANN Technical Liaison Group Appointment Cindy Morgan will send an e-vote on the ICANN Technical Liaison Group appointment. 8. Executive Session: Multistakeholder Platform on ICT Standardization This topic was deferred to a future meeting. 9. Next IAB Meeting The next IAB meeting will be on 2024-01-31.