Telechat Review of draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-20
review-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-20-secdir-telechat-farrell-2024-02-15-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 23)
Type Telechat Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2024-03-05
Requested 2024-02-15
Authors Linda Dunbar , Ali Sajassi , John Drake , Basil Najem , Susan Hares
I-D last updated 2024-02-15
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -19 by Stephen Farrell (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -20 by Stephen Farrell (diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -16 by Juan-Carlos Zúñiga (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -15 by Stephen Farrell (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -14 by Stephen Farrell (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -14 by Dan Romascanu (diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -06 by Shuping Peng (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Stephen Farrell
State Completed
Request Telechat review on draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/MWba8_cmTh5bycFR3G6dRR2-wyM
Reviewed revision 20 (document currently at 23)
Result Has issues
Completed 2024-02-15
review-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-20-secdir-telechat-farrell-2024-02-15-00
Draft-20 seems to dial-back the call for BGP/TLS, but OTOH adds text in the
security considerations saying that BGP/TLS "is imperative." I'm not sure of
the security pitfalls that might arise if one followed the guidance here whilst
BGP/TLS is still just a non-wg -00 draft (and hence aspirational), but it seems
to me like a possibly dangerous implement.