Telechat Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-09
review-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-09-genart-telechat-korhonen-2017-02-21-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 13)
Type Telechat Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2017-03-14
Requested 2017-02-14
Authors Hao Long , Min Ye , Greg Mirsky , Alessandro D'Alessandro , Himanshu C. Shah
I-D last updated 2017-02-21
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -07 by Jouni Korhonen (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -07 by Rifaat Shekh-Yusef (diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -05 by Jonathan Hardwick (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -08 by Jouni Korhonen (diff)
Opsdir Telechat review of -08 by Mehmet Ersue (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -09 by Jouni Korhonen (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -10 by Jouni Korhonen (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Jouni Korhonen
State Completed
Request Telechat review on draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Reviewed revision 09 (document currently at 13)
Result Ready
Completed 2017-02-21
review-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-09-genart-telechat-korhonen-2017-02-21-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-??
Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen
Review Date: 2017-02-21
IETF LC End Date: 2016-10-24
IESG Telechat date: 2017-03-16

Summary:

I have reviewed two earlier versions of this document. All my comments have
been addressed. I am also happy to see my earlier comments generated (I
believe) a draft addressing the generalized SCSI TLV specification work in
TEAS, and this draft referencing to that work.

Major issues:

none.

Minor issues:

none.

Nits/editorial comments:

There are minor editorials here and there, but those will be picked up by the
RFC editor in any case.