Telechat Review of draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-09
review-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-09-secdir-telechat-shekh-yusef-2017-04-08-00

Request Review of draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 25)
Type Telechat Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2017-04-11
Requested 2017-03-26
Authors Kathleen Moriarty , Al Morton
I-D last updated 2018-07-24 (Latest revision 2018-03-16)
Completed reviews Secdir Telechat review of -09 by Rifaat Shekh-Yusef (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -10 by Meral Shirazipour (diff)
Rtgdir IETF Last Call review of -13 by Ines Robles (diff)
Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -13 by Joe Clarke (diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -13 by Meral Shirazipour (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -13 by Rifaat Shekh-Yusef (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -15 by Meral Shirazipour (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
State Completed
Request Telechat review on draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Reviewed revision 09 (document currently at 25)
Result Has nits
Completed 2017-04-08
review-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-09-secdir-telechat-shekh-yusef-2017-04-08-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like any other last call comments.

Summary: *Ready with nits*

The document describes security and management functions that might be
impacted by the increased use of encryption.
The goal of the document is to only list the potential problems, not to
propose
solutions to these problems.


*nits:*

1. The document refers to an Appendix in multiples places, which is now
section 7.
2. Page 18, second line: the word 'trusted' has quotes around it; is there
a reason for that?

Regards,
 Rifaat