Last Call Review of draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing-07
review-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing-07-rtgdir-lc-retana-2024-08-12-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 10) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir) | |
| Deadline | 2024-08-13 | |
| Requested | 2024-07-25 | |
| Requested by | Jim Guichard | |
| Authors | Daniel King , John Drake , Haomian Zheng , Adrian Farrel | |
| I-D last updated | 2024-08-12 | |
| Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Early review of -06
by Tony Przygienda
(diff)
Rtgdir Last Call review of -07 by Alvaro Retana (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -07 by Linda Dunbar (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -07 by Joe Clarke (diff) Genart Last Call review of -07 by Peter E. Yee (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Alvaro Retana |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing by Routing Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/bZ7_tCBIXO3IRa3G90Y3yQynY3I | |
| Reviewed revision | 07 (document currently at 10) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2024-08-12 |
review-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing-07-rtgdir-lc-retana-2024-08-12-00
Hi! I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/rtg/RtgDir Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by updating the draft. Document: draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing-07 Reviewer: Alvaro Retana Review Date: August 12, 2024. Intended Status: Informational Summary: This document is basically ready for publication but I have some concerns that I think should be resolved before publication. Comments: The document is well structured and easy to read. I have two concerns: (1) Security Considerations The text in §6 is good. For completeness, it would benefit from a pointer to the Security Considerations in rfc8453 and rfc9543, as well as the Privacy Considerations in that last document. (2) References Based on the definitions from the IESG Statement on Normative and Informative References [1], I believe some of the Informative references should be Normative because they refer to "documents that must be read to understand or implement the technology" in this document. The terminology from I-D.ietf-teas-enhanced-vpn is used. Unless the text in §4 is used as an example of the applicability (but that was not mentioned), the drafts/RFCs mentioned there as specifics on how the ACTN framework is applied to network slicing should be Normative: I-D.ietf-teas-actn-pm-telemetry-autonomics, I-D.ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang, I-D.ietf-teas-ietf-network-slice-nbi-yang, I-D.ietf-teas-te-service-mapping-yang, I-D.ietf-teas-yang-te, RFC8299, and RFC8466. [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/statement-iesg-iesg-statement-normative-and-informative-references Alvaro.